Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37917618›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Development and initial validation of the Orthotic Patient-Reported Outcomes-Mobility (OPRO-M): An item bank for evaluating mobility of people who use lower-limb orthoses.

Geoffrey S Balkman, Alyssa M Bamer, Phillip M Stevens, Eric L Weber, Sara J Morgan, Rana Salem, Dagmar Amtmann, Brian J Hafner

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT07439315 (The Effect of a Novel Joint Distraction Knee Orthosis for Treating Medial Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07439315 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of a Novel Joint Distraction Knee Orthosis for Treating Medial Knee Osteoarthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorIcarus Medical InnovationsRan2026 to 2026Enrolled150ConditionsMedial Compartment Knee OsteoarthritisArmsMedial joint distraction brace
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Geoffrey S BalkmanDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1087-4647
Alyssa M BamerDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Phillip M StevensHanger Institute for Clinical Research and Education, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
Eric L WeberHanger Institute for Clinical Research and Education, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
Sara J MorganDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8059-3659
Rana SalemDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Dagmar AmtmannDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Brian J HafnerDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6175-1869
University of Washington · USHouston Institute for Clinical Research · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lower limb orthoses (LLOs) are externally-applied leg braces that are designed to improve or maintain mobility in people with a variety of health conditions that affect lower limb function. Clinicians and researchers are therefore often motivated to measure LLO users' mobility to select or assess the effectiveness of these devices. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can provide insights into important aspects of a LLO user's mobility for these purposes. However, few PROMs are available to measure mobility of LLO users. Those few that exist have issues that may limit their clinical or scientific utility. The objective of this study was to create a population-specific item bank for measuring mobility of LLO users. Previously-developed candidate items were administered in a cross-sectional study to a large national sample of LLO users. Responses from study participants (n = 1036) were calibrated to a graded response statistical model using Item Response Theory methods. A set of 39 items was found to be unidimensional, locally independent, and function without bias due to characteristics unrelated to mobility. The set of final calibrated items, termed the Orthotic Patient-Reported Outcomes-Mobility (OPRO-M) item bank, was evaluated for initial evidence of convergent, divergent, and known groups construct validity. OPRO-M was strongly correlated with existing PROMs designed to measure aspects of physical function. Conversely, OPRO-M was weakly correlated with PROMs that measured unrelated constructs, like sleep disturbance and depression. OPRO-M also showed an ability to differentiate groups with expected mobility differences. Two fixed-length short forms were created from the OPRO-M item bank. Items on the short forms were selected based on statistical and clinical criteria. Collectively, results from this study indicate that OPRO-M can effectively measure mobility of LLO users, and OPRO-M short forms can now be recommended for use in routine clinical practice and research studies.

Indexed as

Lower ExtremityPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID37917618
PMCPMC10621838
OpenAlexW4388215226

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.