Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37922101›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in behavioral neurosciences2024

SSRIs in the Treatment of Depression: A Pharmacological CUL-DE-SAC?

Philip J Cowen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
19.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Philip J CowenDepartment of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. phil.cowen@psych.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread adoption of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) as first-line pharmacological treatments in the management of clinical depression transformed the landscape of drug therapy for this condition. SSRIs are safer and better tolerated than the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) that they replaced. However, they have limitations that may have placed a ceiling on the expectations of first-line pharmacological treatment. Notable problems with SSRIs include induction of anxiety on treatment initiation, delayed onset of significant therapeutic effect, sexual dysfunction, sleep disturbance and overall modest efficacy. The latter is linked with an inability of SSRIs to effectively treat syndromes of anhedonia and cognitive impairment. Combined serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), such as venlafaxine, have produced some limited improvements over SSRIs in efficacy, at the cost of a greater side-effect burden. Attempts to supplement serotonin reuptake activity with actions at serotonin receptor sub-types have not yet yielded substantial benefits; however, vortioxetine may provide more utility in the management of cognitive impairment. Future advances might come from the development of SNRIs, which more closely mimic the actions of effective TCAs. There may also be possible benefits to be derived from combining SSRIs with 5-HT

Indexed as

Selective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsAntidepressive AgentsDepressionHumansSerotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake InhibitorsAntidepressive AgentsSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSerotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors5-HT1A receptor5-HT2A/2C receptor5-HT4 receptor5-HT7 receptorAntidepressantsAnxietyDepressionSerotoninSerotonin (5-HT) receptorsSNRIsSSRIsTCAsVilazodoneVortioxetine

Identifiers

PMID37922101
OpenAlexW4388308664

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.