ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2023
Factorizing polygenic epistasis improves prediction and uncovers biological pathways in complex traits.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- CRISPR-Enabled functional genomics in hPSCs-derived neural models for autism spectrum disorder.Metabolic brain disease · 2026Review
- From family trials to genomic mate allocation: statistical and genomic strategies to accelerate sugarcane genetic improvement.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Review
- Dissecting the polygenic architecture of psychopathology via singular value decomposition of eight psychiatric genome-wide association studies and evaluation of component-based polygenic scores.General psychiatry · 2026Article
- The polygenic, omnigenic and stratagenic models of complex disease risk.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- Decoding structural birth defects through genomic landscapes: Innovative frameworks for diagnosis (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Exploring Random Forest in Genetic Risk Score Construction.Genetic epidemiology · 2025Article
- A biobank-scale test of marginal epistasis reveals genome-wide signals of polygenic interaction effects.Nature genetics · 2025Article
- Learning sequence-function relationships with scalable, interpretable Gaussian processes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Genetic risk effects on psychiatric disorders act in sets.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based polygenic scores enhance generalizability of psychiatric disorders prediction.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Resolving discrepancies between chimeric and multiplicative measures of higher-order epistasis.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A scalable adaptive quadratic kernel method for interpretable epistasis analysis in complex traits.Genome research · 2024Article
- Cluster effect for SNP-SNP interaction pairs for predicting complex traits.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Improving Genetic Association Studies with a Novel Methodology that Unveils the Hidden Complexity of All-Cause Heart Failure.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epistasis is central in many domains of biology, but it has not yet been proven useful for understanding the etiology of complex traits. This is partly because complex-trait epistasis involves polygenic interactions that are poorly captured in current models. To address this gap, we developed a model called Epistasis Factor Analysis (EFA). EFA assumes that polygenic epistasis can be factorized into interactions between a few epistasis factors (EFs), which represent latent polygenic components of the observed complex trait. The statistical goals of EFA are to improve polygenic prediction and to increase power to detect epistasis, while the biological goal is to unravel genetic effects into more-homogeneous units. We mathematically characterize EFA and use simulations to show that EFA outperforms current epistasis models when its assumptions approximately hold. Applied to predicting yeast growth rates, EFA outperforms the additive model for several traits with large epistasis heritability and uniformly outperforms the standard epistasis model. We replicate these prediction improvements in a second dataset. We then apply EFA to four previously characterized traits in the UK Biobank and find statistically significant epistasis in all four, including two that are robust to scale transformation. Moreover, we find that the inferred EFs partly recover pre-defined biological pathways for two of the traits. Our results demonstrate that more realistic models can identify biologically and statistically meaningful epistasis in complex traits, indicating that epistasis has potential for precision medicine and characterizing the biology underlying GWAS results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.