Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37922884›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2023

Factorizing polygenic epistasis improves prediction and uncovers biological pathways in complex traits.

David Tang, Jerome Freudenberg, Andy Dahl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genetic risk effects on psychiatric disorders act in sets.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David TangSection of Genetic Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Program in Bioinformatics and Integrative Genomics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: davidtang@g.harvard.edu.
Jerome FreudenbergSection of Genetic Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Bioinformatics Interdepartmental Program, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Andy DahlSection of Genetic Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. Electronic address: andywdahl@uchicago.edu.

Funding

Novel statistical genetics methods to unravel polygenic interactions in complex traitsR35GM150822 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Andrew Dahl · 2023 to 2026
$1.6M
Characterizing individual- and subtype-specific risk factors and treatments in asthmaK25HL157603 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DAHL, ANDREW · 2021 to 2023
$519k
NHLBI NIH HHS K25 HL157603NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM150822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epistasis is central in many domains of biology, but it has not yet been proven useful for understanding the etiology of complex traits. This is partly because complex-trait epistasis involves polygenic interactions that are poorly captured in current models. To address this gap, we developed a model called Epistasis Factor Analysis (EFA). EFA assumes that polygenic epistasis can be factorized into interactions between a few epistasis factors (EFs), which represent latent polygenic components of the observed complex trait. The statistical goals of EFA are to improve polygenic prediction and to increase power to detect epistasis, while the biological goal is to unravel genetic effects into more-homogeneous units. We mathematically characterize EFA and use simulations to show that EFA outperforms current epistasis models when its assumptions approximately hold. Applied to predicting yeast growth rates, EFA outperforms the additive model for several traits with large epistasis heritability and uniformly outperforms the standard epistasis model. We replicate these prediction improvements in a second dataset. We then apply EFA to four previously characterized traits in the UK Biobank and find statistically significant epistasis in all four, including two that are robust to scale transformation. Moreover, we find that the inferred EFs partly recover pre-defined biological pathways for two of the traits. Our results demonstrate that more realistic models can identify biologically and statistically meaningful epistasis in complex traits, indicating that epistasis has potential for precision medicine and characterizing the biology underlying GWAS results.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticMultifactorial InheritanceHumansModels, GeneticPhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotidecomplex traitepistasisgenetic architecture

Identifiers

PMID37922884
PMCPMC10645564

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.