Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37923932›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2024

The impact of leucine supplementation on body composition and glucose tolerance following energy restriction: an 8-week RCT in adults at risk of the metabolic syndrome.

Kaveri Pathak, Yun Zhao, Emily K Calton, Anthony P James, Philip Newsholme, Jill Sherriff, Mario J Soares

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Defatted chia (Current research in food science · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kaveri PathakCurtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley Campus, Perth, WA, 6102, Australia. Kaveri.Pathak@curtin.edu.au.
Yun ZhaoCurtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley Campus, Perth, WA, 6102, Australia.
Emily K CaltonCurtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley Campus, Perth, WA, 6102, Australia.
Anthony P JamesCurtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley Campus, Perth, WA, 6102, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0873-3714
Philip NewsholmeCurtin Medical School, Curtin University, Bentley Campus, Perth, WA, 6102, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0500-6984
Jill SherriffCurtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley Campus, Perth, WA, 6102, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4283-958X
Mario J SoaresCurtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley Campus, Perth, WA, 6102, Australia. m.soares@curtin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6071-0272
Curtin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundL-Leucine (Leu) supplementation may benefit fat-free mass (FFM) per se and glucose metabolism.

objectivesTo determine whether Leu supplementation during energy restriction blunted the loss of FFM, enhanced the loss of fat mass (FM) and improved glucose tolerance.

designThirty-seven adults, aged 20-65 years, with increased waist circumference and at least one other metabolic syndrome (MetS) component, were selected. We employed a two-arm parallel, double blind, randomized control trial (RCT) design. Participants were randomly assigned to an intervention group (leucine - 3 g/d) or placebo (lactose - 2.67 g/d), while following an individualised energy restricted diet for an 8-week period. Detailed body composition (DEXA), oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), insulin and components of MetS were measured before and after the trial. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) assessed the effect of Leu on an intention-to-treat (ITT) principle. Bootstrapping method with 1000 bootstrap samples was used to derive parameter estimates, standard errors, p-values, and 95% confidence intervals for all outcomes.

resultsAdjusted for baseline values and other covariates, FFM (p = 0.045) and lean tissue mass (LTM) (p = 0.050) were significantly higher following Leu. These outcomes were modified by a significant treatment x sex interaction that indicated Leu had the greater effect in men. However, on adjustment for body composition changes, there was no difference in insulin sensitivity, oral glucose tolerance, or change in MetS components following Leu.

conclusionShort-term leucine supplementation during energy restriction resulted in a greater preservation of FFM and LTM particularly in men, but did not impact glucose metabolism.

Indexed as

Metabolic SyndromeAdultBody CompositionDietary SupplementsGlucoseHumansLeucineMaleGlucoseLeucine

Identifiers

PMID37923932
PMCPMC10853066
OpenAlexW4388290762

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.