Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37923946›Full record

ArticlePituitary2024

Consensus on criteria for acromegaly diagnosis and remission.

Andrea Giustina, Nienke Biermasz, Felipe F Casanueva, Maria Fleseriu, Pietro Mortini, Christian Strasburger, A J van der Lely, John Wass, Shlomo Melmed, Acromegaly Consensus Group

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Pituitary, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 128 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
128citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
32.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

128 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical characteristics associated with somaticFrontiers in endocrinology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Is endoscopic diving technique effective in surgical management of functioning pituitary adenomas? A prospective randomized study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Growth hormone-releasing hormone, growth hormone, and neuroendocrine tumors.Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Can acromegaly be controlled in all cases?Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article

68 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Andrea GiustinaSan Raffaele Vita-Salute University and IRCCS Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Nienke BiermaszLeiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Felipe F CasanuevaSantiago de Compostela University, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Maria FleseriuOregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Pietro MortiniSan Raffaele Vita-Salute University and IRCCS Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Christian StrasburgerCharité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
A J van der LelyErasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
John WassChurchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Shlomo MelmedCedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd, NT 2015, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA. melmed@csmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2355-3447
Acromegaly Consensus Group
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEChurchill Hospital · GBErasmus MC · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe 14th Acromegaly Consensus Conference was convened to consider biochemical criteria for acromegaly diagnosis and evaluation of therapeutic efficacy.

methodsFifty-six acromegaly experts from 16 countries reviewed and discussed current evidence focused on biochemical assays; criteria for diagnosis and the role of imaging, pathology, and clinical assessments; consequences of diagnostic delay; criteria for remission and recommendations for follow up; and the value of assessment and monitoring in defining disease progression, selecting appropriate treatments, and maximizing patient outcomes.

resultsIn a patient with typical acromegaly features, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I > 1.3 times the upper limit of normal for age confirms the diagnosis. Random growth hormone (GH) measured after overnight fasting may be useful for informing prognosis, but is not required for diagnosis. For patients with equivocal results, IGF-I measurements using the same validated assay can be repeated, and oral glucose tolerance testing might also be useful. Although biochemical remission is the primary assessment of treatment outcome, biochemical findings should be interpreted within the clinical context of acromegaly. Follow up assessments should consider biochemical evaluation of treatment effectiveness, imaging studies evaluating residual/recurrent adenoma mass, and clinical signs and symptoms of acromegaly, its complications, and comorbidities. Referral to a multidisciplinary pituitary center should be considered for patients with equivocal biochemical, pathology, or imaging findings at diagnosis, and for patients insufficiently responsive to standard treatment approaches.

conclusionConsensus recommendations highlight new understandings of disordered GH and IGF-I in patients with acromegaly and the importance of expert management for this rare disease.

Indexed as

AcromegalyHuman Growth HormoneDelayed DiagnosisGrowth HormoneHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor IGrowth HormoneHuman Growth HormoneInsulin-Like Growth Factor IAcromegalyAssaysDiagnosisGrowth hormoneInsulin-like growth factor IRemission criteria

Identifiers

PMID37923946
PMCPMC10837217
OpenAlexW4388283521

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.