ReviewBiofilm2023
Host-microbe interactions in chronic rhinosinusitis biofilms and models for investigation.
Review in Biofilm, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A murine sinonasal infection model recapitulates key features of clinical chronic rhinosinusitis.Journal of medical microbiology · 2026Article
- Molecular Profiles and Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Bacterial Isolates from Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patients.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Observational
- Bogland plant Tormentil inhibits multidrug-resistant pathogen growth and potentiates antibiotics by disrupting iron homeostasis.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2026Article
- The infectome framework: linking polymicrobial ecology and biofilm dynamics to precision diagnostic approaches.Infection · 2026Review
- Research progress on multispecies animal models of chronic rhinosinusitis: modeling strategies and research applications.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
- Acoustic therapy for allergic rhinitis and chronic rhinosinusitis: modulating microbiome, immunity and well-being.Frontiers in allergy · 2025Review
- Towards improved biofilm models.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a debilitating condition characterized by long-lasting inflammation of the paranasal sinuses. It affects a significant portion of the population, causing a considerable burden on individuals and healthcare systems. The pathogenesis of CRS is multifactorial, with bacterial infections playing a crucial role in CRS development and persistence. In recent years, the presence of biofilms has emerged as a key contributor to the chronicity of sinusitis, further complicating treatment and exacerbating symptoms. This review aims to explore the role of biofilms in CRS, focusing on the involvement of the bacterial species
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.