Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37929645›Full record

ReviewMagnetic resonance in medicine2024

Current status in spatiotemporal analysis of contrast-based perfusion MRI.

Eve S Shalom, Amirul Khan, Sven Van Loo, Steven P Sourbron

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eve S ShalomSchool of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8762-3726
Amirul KhanSchool of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7521-5458
Sven Van LooSchool of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4746-8500
Steven P SourbronDivision of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3374-3973

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council 2282622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In perfusion MRI, image voxels form a spatially organized network of systems, all exchanging indicator with their immediate neighbors. Yet the current paradigm for perfusion MRI analysis treats all voxels or regions-of-interest as isolated systems supplied by a single global source. This simplification not only leads to long-recognized systematic errors but also fails to leverage the embedded spatial structure within the data. Since the early 2000s, a variety of models and implementations have been proposed to analyze systems with between-voxel interactions. In general, this leads to large and connected numerical inverse problems that are intractible with conventional computational methods. With recent advances in machine learning, however, these approaches are becoming practically feasible, opening up the way for a paradigm shift in the approach to perfusion MRI. This paper seeks to review the work in spatiotemporal modelling of perfusion MRI using a coherent, harmonized nomenclature and notation, with clear physical definitions and assumptions. The aim is to introduce clarity in the state-of-the-art of this promising new approach to perfusion MRI, and help to identify gaps of knowledge and priorities for future research.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaMagnetic Resonance ImagingPerfusionSpatio-Temporal AnalysisContrast MediaDCE-MRIDSC-MRIperfusionspatiotemporal modelingtracer kinetics

Identifiers

PMID37929645
PMCPMC10962600

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.