Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37930996›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Introducing effective parameters for predicting job burnout using a self-organizing method based on group method of data handling neural network.

Tingting Fan, Ehsan Nazemi

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tingting FanAssumption University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ehsan NazemiFaculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Southampton University, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5457-6943

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to affecting people's bodily and mental health, the Covid-19 epidemic has also altered the emotional and mental well-being of many workers. Especially in the realm of institutions and privately held enterprises, which encountered a plethora of constraints due to the peculiar circumstances of the epidemic. It was thus anticipated that the present study would use a group method of data handling (GMDH) neural network for analyzing the relationship of demographic factors, Coronavirus, resilience, and the burnout in startups. The test methodology was quantitative. The research examined 384 startup directors and representatives, which is a sizable proportion of the limitless community. The BRCS, the MBI-GS, and custom-made assessments of stress due to the Coronavirus were all used to collect data. Cronbach's alpha confirmed the polls' dependability, and an expert panel confirmed the surveys' authenticity. The GMDH neural network's inherent potential for self-organization was used to choose the most useful properties automatically. The trained network has a three-layered topology with 4, 3, and 2 neurons in each of the hidden layers. The GMDH network has significantly reduced the computational load by using just 7 parameters of marital status, stress of covid-19, job experience, professional efficiency, gender, age, and resilience for burnout categorization. After comparing the neural network's output with the acquired data, it was determined that the constructed network accurately classified all of the information. Among the achievements of this research, high accuracy in predicting job burnout, checking the performance of neural network in determining job burnout and introducing effective characteristics in determination of this parameter can be mentioned.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalCOVID-19EmotionsHumansJob SatisfactionNeural Networks, ComputerSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID37930996
PMCPMC10627462

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.