Trial reportNan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University2023
[Driving pressure-guided lung protective ventilation strategy reduces postoperative pulmonary complications in patients recovered from COVID-19].
Trial report in Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of driving pressure-guided positive end-expiratory pressure on respiratory mechanics and clinical outcomes in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Annals of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- Role of recruitment manoeuvres in reducing postoperative pulmonary complications during driving pressure-guided ventilation: a meta-analysis and sequential analysis.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Driving pressure: A useful tool for reducing postoperative pulmonary complications.World journal of critical care medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the value of lung protective ventilation strategy (LPVS) guided by driving pressure for preventing postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients recovered from COVID-19 and optimize intraoperative respiratory management.
methodsFrom December, 2022 to February, 2023, a total of 118 patients recovered from COVID-19 within a month (ASA Ⅰ~Ⅲ, aged ≥18 years) undergoing elective non-cardiac surgeries under general anesthesia in our hospital were randomized equally into LPVS group and control group.The patients in LPVS group received a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg with an individualized PEEP guided by minimum driving pressure and lung re-expansion every 30 min, and those in the control group received conventional mechanical ventilation.The incidence of PPCs and hypoxemia and pulmonary ultrasound score of the patients were compared between the two groups.
resultsThere was no significant difference in the baseline data between LPVS group and the control group (
conclusionLPVS guided by driving pressure can improve oxygenation and reduce the risk of PPCs in patients recently recovered from COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.