Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37935709›Full record

ArticleNPJ Regenerative medicine2023

Mfap4: a promising target for enhanced liver regeneration and chronic liver disease treatment.

Viktoriia Iakovleva, Anna Wuestefeld, Agnes Bee Leng Ong, Rong Gao, Neslihan Arife Kaya, May Yin Lee, Weiwei Zhai, Wai Leong Tam, Yock Young Dan, Torsten Wuestefeld

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ Regenerative medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Gene-based therapies for steatotic liver disease.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  8. MASH and the race for liver antifibrotics.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Viktoriia Iakovleva *Laboratory of In Vivo Genetics and Gene Therapy, Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 60 Biopolis Street, Singapore, 138672, Republic of Singapore.
Anna Wuestefeld *Laboratory of In Vivo Genetics and Gene Therapy, Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 60 Biopolis Street, Singapore, 138672, Republic of Singapore.
Agnes Bee Leng OngLaboratory of In Vivo Genetics and Gene Therapy, Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 60 Biopolis Street, Singapore, 138672, Republic of Singapore.
Rong GaoLaboratory of In Vivo Genetics and Gene Therapy, Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 60 Biopolis Street, Singapore, 138672, Republic of Singapore.
Neslihan Arife KayaLaboratory of Translational Cancer Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 60 Biopolis Street, Singapore, 138672, Republic of Singapore.
May Yin LeeLaboratory of Translational Cancer Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 60 Biopolis Street, Singapore, 138672, Republic of Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2366-9463
Weiwei ZhaiKey Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101, Beijing, China.
Wai Leong TamLaboratory of Translational Cancer Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 60 Biopolis Street, Singapore, 138672, Republic of Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2365-5264
Yock Young DanDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 119228, Republic of Singapore.
Torsten WuestefeldLaboratory of In Vivo Genetics and Gene Therapy, Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 60 Biopolis Street, Singapore, 138672, Republic of Singapore. wustefeldt@gis.a-star.edu.sg.
Agency for Science, Technology and Research · SGChinese Academy of Sciences · CNNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

MOH | National Medical Research Council (NMRC) NMRC/OFIRG/0063/2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The liver has a remarkable regenerative capacity. Nevertheless, under chronic liver-damaging conditions, this capacity becomes exhausted, allowing the accumulation of fibrotic tissue and leading to end-stage liver disease. Enhancing the endogenous regenerative capacity by targeting regeneration breaks is an innovative therapeutic approach. We set up an in vivo functional genetic screen to identify such regeneration breaks. As the top hit, we identified Microfibril associated protein 4 (Mfap4). Knockdown of Mfap4 in hepatocytes enhances cell proliferation, accelerates liver regeneration, and attenuates chronic liver disease by reducing liver fibrosis. Targeting Mfap4 modulates several liver regeneration-related pathways including mTOR. Our research opens the way to siRNA-based therapeutics to enhance hepatocyte-based liver regeneration.

Identifiers

PMID37935709
PMCPMC10630300
OpenAlexW4388462099

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.