ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences
Comparison of the effect of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in the treatment of end-stage renal disease.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Electromyographic findings and frailty in hemodialysis vs peritoneal dialysis patients.Renal failure · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting treatment failure in culture-negative peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis in elderly ESRD patients: a retrospective cohort study on survival and the role of comorbidities.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Vitamin C and Benzoic Acid Intake in Patients with Kidney Disease: Is There Risk of Benzene Exposure?Nutrients · 2025Review
- Vitamin C status across the spectrum of chronic kidney disease and healthy controls: a cross-sectional study.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2025Article
- Impact of dialysis modality on survival after kidney transplant failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Review
- Cost-Utility Analyses of Hemodialysis, Peritoneal Dialysis, and Kidney Transplantation in Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the clinical effects of hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) in the treatment of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Methods: Clinical data of ESRD patients who received HD (n=74) and PD (n=77) for more than 12 months in the First People's Hospital of Tonglu County from October 2020 to November 2021 were retrospectively selected. Renal function indexes, blood pressure, and complication rates in the two groups before the first dialysis and at the end of the observation period were compared. Results: After the dialysis, the urea nitrogen (BUN) levels decreased in both groups, and were significantly lower in the PD group compared to the HD group. Urea clearance index (Kt/V) increased, and were significantly higher in the PD group compared to the HD group ( Conclusions: Peritoneal dialysis is more effective in maintaining the hemodynamic stability for ESRD patients, reducing blood pressure level, improving the clearance rate of molecular substances, and protecting the renal function of patients compared to hemodialysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.