Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37940595›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2023

Rethinking Remapping: Circuit Mechanisms of Recovery after Stroke.

Baruc Campos, Hoseok Choi, Andrew T DeMarco, Anna Seydell-Greenwald, Sara J Hussain, Mary T Joy, Peter E Turkeltaub, William Zeiger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Right hemisphere language network plasticity in aphasia.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Baruc CamposDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095.
Hoseok ChoiDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neuroscience, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94158.ORCID 0000-0001-5930-3688
Andrew T DeMarcoCenter for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Georgetown University Medical Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057.ORCID 0000-0003-1987-2012
Anna Seydell-GreenwaldCenter for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Georgetown University Medical Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057.ORCID 0000-0002-7292-8575
Sara J HussainMovement and Cognitive Rehabilitation Science Program, Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712.
Mary T JoyThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine 04609.ORCID 0000-0002-3120-2022
Peter E TurkeltaubCenter for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Georgetown University Medical Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057.ORCID 0000-0003-2080-6055
William ZeigerDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095 wzeiger@mednet.ucla.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0567-2239

Funding

Contributions of spared brain structures and connections to aphasia recoveryR01DC014960 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI TURKELTAUB, PETER ETHAN · 2017 to 2021
$4.0M
Neurorehabilitation and Restorative Neuroscience NetworkK12HD093427 · NICHD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI BREGMAN, BARBARA S, DROMERICK, ALEXANDER W · 2017 to 2021
$3.9M
Visuospatial deficits after stroke: Towards better classification, diagnostics, and rehabilitation.R01HD105735 · NICHD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI Anna Greenwald · 2022 to 2026
$2.1M
Mechanisms of Somatosensory Circuit Remapping After Cortical Injury in MiceK08NS114165 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ZEIGER, WILLIAM ABEL · 2021 to 2025
$1.1M
Functional anomaly mapping of aphasia recoveryR00DC018828 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI DEMARCO, ANDREW T · 2023 to 2025
$747k
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD093427NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD105735NIDCD NIH HHS R00 DC018828NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014960NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS114165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is one of the most common causes of disability, and there are few treatments that can improve recovery after stroke. Therapeutic development has been hindered because of a lack of understanding of precisely how neural circuits are affected by stroke, and how these circuits change to mediate recovery. Indeed, some of the hypotheses for how the CNS changes to mediate recovery, including remapping, redundancy, and diaschisis, date to more than a century ago. Recent technological advances have enabled the interrogation of neural circuits with ever greater temporal and spatial resolution. These techniques are increasingly being applied across animal models of stroke and to human stroke survivors, and are shedding light on the molecular, structural, and functional changes that neural circuits undergo after stroke. Here we review these studies and highlight important mechanisms that underlie impairment and recovery after stroke. We begin by summarizing knowledge about changes in neural activity that occur in the peri-infarct cortex, specifically considering evidence for the functional remapping hypothesis of recovery. Next, we describe the importance of neural population dynamics, disruptions in these dynamics after stroke, and how allocation of neurons into spared circuits can restore functionality. On a more global scale, we then discuss how effects on long-range pathways, including interhemispheric interactions and corticospinal tract transmission, contribute to post-stroke impairments. Finally, we look forward and consider how a deeper understanding of neural circuit mechanisms of recovery may lead to novel treatments to reduce disability and improve recovery after stroke.

Indexed as

StrokeAnimalsCerebral CortexHumansNeuronsPyramidal TractsRecovery of Function

Identifiers

PMID37940595
PMCPMC10634578

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.