Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37941140›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2024

Multiple sequence alignment-based RNA language model and its application to structural inference.

Yikun Zhang, Mei Lang, Jiuhong Jiang, Zhiqiang Gao, Fan Xu, Thomas Litfin, Ke Chen, Jaswinder Singh, Xiansong Huang, Guoli Song and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Accurate RNA-Ligand Binding Site Prediction Based on a Multi-Channel Graph Neural Network.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Large language models for bioinformatics.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yikun ZhangSchool of Electronic and Computer Engineering, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Mei LangInstitute of Systems and Physical Biology, Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen 518107, China.
Jiuhong JiangInstitute of Systems and Physical Biology, Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen 518107, China.
Zhiqiang GaoShanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Shanghai 200232, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8644-1541
Fan XuPeng Cheng Laboratory, Shenzhen 518066, China.
Thomas LitfinInstitute for Glycomics, Griffith University, Parklands Dr, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia.
Ke ChenInstitute of Systems and Physical Biology, Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen 518107, China.
Jaswinder SinghInstitute of Systems and Physical Biology, Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen 518107, China.
Xiansong HuangPeng Cheng Laboratory, Shenzhen 518066, China.
Guoli SongPeng Cheng Laboratory, Shenzhen 518066, China.
Yonghong TianPeng Cheng Laboratory, Shenzhen 518066, China.
Jian ZhanInstitute of Systems and Physical Biology, Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen 518107, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0856-2385
Jie ChenSchool of Electronic and Computer Engineering, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Yaoqi ZhouInstitute of Systems and Physical Biology, Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen 518107, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9958-5699

Funding

Griffith UniversityNational Key R&D Program of China 2022ZD0160100Natural Science Foundation of China 22350710182Natural Science Foundation of China 61972217Shenzhen Science and Technology Program KQTD20170330155106581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared with proteins, DNA and RNA are more difficult languages to interpret because four-letter coded DNA/RNA sequences have less information content than 20-letter coded protein sequences. While BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers)-like language models have been developed for RNA, they are ineffective at capturing the evolutionary information from homologous sequences because unlike proteins, RNA sequences are less conserved. Here, we have developed an unsupervised multiple sequence alignment-based RNA language model (RNA-MSM) by utilizing homologous sequences from an automatic pipeline, RNAcmap, as it can provide significantly more homologous sequences than manually annotated Rfam. We demonstrate that the resulting unsupervised, two-dimensional attention maps and one-dimensional embeddings from RNA-MSM contain structural information. In fact, they can be directly mapped with high accuracy to 2D base pairing probabilities and 1D solvent accessibilities, respectively. Further fine-tuning led to significantly improved performance on these two downstream tasks compared with existing state-of-the-art techniques including SPOT-RNA2 and RNAsnap2. By comparison, RNA-FM, a BERT-based RNA language model, performs worse than one-hot encoding with its embedding in base pair and solvent-accessible surface area prediction. We anticipate that the pre-trained RNA-MSM model can be fine-tuned on many other tasks related to RNA structure and function.

Indexed as

Machine LearningRNASequence AlignmentDNAProteinsSolventsDNAProteinsRNASolvents

Identifiers

PMID37941140
PMCPMC10783488

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.