Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37945324›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of sports medicine2024

A new measure of exercise adherence: the ATEMPT (Adherence To Exercise for Musculoskeletal Pain Tool).

Daniel Leslie Bailey, Annette Bishop, Gareth McCray, Nadine E Foster, Melanie A Holden

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Exercise rehabilitation with tailored support for exercise adherence for people with vertebral fragility fractures is more effective than standard rehabilitation: the OPTIN randomised controlled trial.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel Leslie BaileyPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK d.bailey2@keele.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9323-1884
Annette BishopPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
Gareth McCrayPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
Nadine E FosterPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
Melanie A HoldenPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
Arthritis UK · GBThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to (1) develop a new measure of adherence to exercise for musculoskeletal (MSK) pain (Adherence To Exercise for Musculoskeletal Pain Tool: ATEMPT) based on previously conceptualised domains of exercise adherence, (2) report the content and structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and measurement error for the ATEMPT outcome measure in patients managed with exercise for MSK pain.

methodsATEMPT was created using statements describing adherence generated by patients, physiotherapists and researchers, with content validity established. Baseline and retest questionnaires were distributed to patients recommended exercise for MSK pain in 11 National Health Service physiotherapy clinics. Items demonstrating low response variation were removed and the following measurement properties assessed: structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and measurement error.

resultsBaseline and retest data were collected from 382 and 112 patients with MSK pain, respectively. Confirmatory factor analysis established that a single factor solution was the best fit according to Bayesian Information Criterion. The 6-item version of the measure (scored 6-30) demonstrated optimal internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha 0.86, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.88) with acceptable levels of test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.84, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.88) and measurement error (smallest detectable change 3.77, 95% CI 3.27 to 4.42) (SE of measurement 2.67, 95% CI 2.31 to 3.16).

conclusionThe 6-item ATEMPT was developed from the six domains of exercise adherence. It has adequate content and structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and measurement error in patients with MSK pain, but should undergo additional testing to establish the construct validity and responsiveness.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal PainBayes TheoremHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsState MedicineSurveys and QuestionnairesExercise

Identifiers

PMID37945324
PMCPMC10804013
OpenAlexW4388540932

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.