ArticleScientific reports2023
Genome interpretation in a federated learning context allows the multi-center exome-based risk prediction of Crohn's disease patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- End-to-end deep learning methods for genetic risk prediction of schizophrenia.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Multimodal deep learning for inflammatory bowel disease: a new frontier in cellular and molecular biomarker discovery to clinical translation.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Data visiting governance: a conceptual framework.Human genomics · 2025Review
- Federated learning for the pathogenicity annotation of genetic variants in multi-site clinical settings.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Explainable deep learning for stratified medicine in inflammatory bowel disease.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Prequalification of genome-based newborn screening for severe childhood genetic diseases through federated training based on purifying hyperselection.American journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- A python library for the fast and scalable computation of biologically meaningful individual specific networks.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-throughput sequencing allowed the discovery of many disease variants, but nowadays it is becoming clear that the abundance of genomics data mostly just moved the bottleneck in Genetics and Precision Medicine from a data availability issue to a data interpretation issue. To solve this empasse it would be beneficial to apply the latest Deep Learning (DL) methods to the Genome Interpretation (GI) problem, similarly to what AlphaFold did for Structural Biology. Unfortunately DL requires large datasets to be viable, and aggregating genomics datasets poses several legal, ethical and infrastructural complications. Federated Learning (FL) is a Machine Learning (ML) paradigm designed to tackle these issues. It allows ML methods to be collaboratively trained and tested on collections of physically separate datasets, without requiring the actual centralization of sensitive data. FL could thus be key to enable DL applications to GI on sufficiently large genomics data. We propose FedCrohn, a FL GI Neural Network model for the exome-based Crohn's Disease risk prediction, providing a proof-of-concept that FL is a viable paradigm to build novel ML GI approaches. We benchmark it in several realistic scenarios, showing that FL can indeed provide performances similar to conventional ML on centralized data, and that collaborating in FL initiatives is likely beneficial for most of the medical centers participating in them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.