Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37946292›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2023

The association between pro-vegetarian dietary pattern and risk of colorectal cancer: a matched case-control study.

Elham Tavassoli Nejad, Elham Moslemi, Fateme Souni, Marzieh Mahmoodi, Mohebat Vali, Mohammad Vatanpour, Mehran Nouri, Atena Ramezani, Zainab Shateri, Bahram Rashidkhani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Adherence to pro-vegetarian dietary patterns and gastric cancer risk: a pooled analysis of the StoP Consortium.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Elham Tavassoli Nejad *Department of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Elham Moslemi *Student Research Committee, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Fateme SouniDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Marzieh MahmoodiNutrition Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mohebat ValiStudent Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7733-2116
Mohammad VatanpourDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mehran NouriDepartment of Community Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7031-3542
Atena RamezaniDiabetes Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0400-8336
Zainab ShateriStudent Research Committee, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran. zainabshateri@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3725-6686
Bahram RashidkhaniDepartment of Community Nutrition, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. rashidkhani@yahoo.com.
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IRAhvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences · IRIsfahan University of Medical Sciences · IRMazandaran University of Medical Sciences · IRNational Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute · IRTabriz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew studies assess the link between plant-based diets and colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence. To our knowledge, no study has examined the association between pro-vegetarian dietary pattern (PDP) and CRC globally or among Iranians. Therefore, the objective of our matched case-control study was to evaluate the association between PDP and CRC in the Iranian population.

methodsThe present research was a hospital-based case (n = 71)-control (n = 142) study conducted in the same hospitals in Tehran, Iran. This study used a reliable and valid semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire to evaluate the participants' dietary intake. According to the residual method, the selected plant and animal foods have been adjusted in the total energy intake to calculate the PDP index. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted for confounding variables were also expressed using logistic regression by SPSS software.

resultsIn the crude and adjusted models, we observed that the odds of CRC decreased significantly in the 3rd and last quartile of PDP compared to the 1st quartile (Q) (Crude model: Q

conclusionsBased on the results of the present case-control study in the Iranian population, it was concluded that PDP, which involves consuming vegetables, fruits, cereals, dairy products, and low meat consumption, reduces the odds of CRC. In conclusion, adherence to PDP is associated with a decreased odds of CRC.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsAnimalsCase-Control StudiesDietHumansIranRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesColorectal cancerColorectal NeoplasmsIranianPro-vegetarian dietary pattern

Identifiers

PMID37946292
PMCPMC10636864
OpenAlexW4388522217

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.