ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2024
Intravenous cyclophosphamide therapy in children with calcineurin inhibitor-resistant steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome in a resource-limited setting.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- NLRP3 as a therapeutic target in cyclophosphamide-associated toxicities.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- Kidney outcomes in children with primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis from a low- and middle- income country.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn pediatric steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS), calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are recommended as first-line therapy, with efficacy ranging between 60 and 80%, implying a substantial proportion will exhibit CNI resistance. Which alternate immunosuppressive therapy should be used in non-genetic pediatric SRNS exhibiting CNI resistance is especially relevant in low- to middle-income countries (LMIC), where the prohibitive costs of certain drugs such as monoclonal antibodies often determine therapy choice.
methodsThe primary objective was to assess the efficacy of intravenous cyclophosphamide in a proportion of children aged 1-18 years with CNI-resistant SRNS with a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) at 6 months from commencement of pulse therapy. The secondary objectives were to assess the proportion and profile of infections and adverse effects.
resultsOf 90 children with idiopathic SRNS presenting between January 2013 and December 2022, 29 (32.2%) had CNI resistance and were enrolled. They were administered monthly intravenous cyclophosphamide pulses (6 pulses). Median (IQR) duration of follow-up was 48 (29.5, 63.5) months. At the end of 6 months of cyclophosphamide therapy, 13 (44.8%) attained CR and 4 (13.8%) attained PR, with an overall cyclophosphamide success rate of 58.6%. The efficacy of intravenous cyclophosphamide was higher in secondary (9/10; 90%) versus primary CNI resistance (8/19; 42.1%) (p = 0.029). Three children (3/29; 10.3%) developed systemic infections within 12 months of initiation of cyclophosphamide therapy, similar to the rate of systemic infections among children receiving CNI for SRNS management (6/41; 14.6%) (p = 0.85).
conclusionsIt is prudent to try intravenous cyclophosphamide in CNI-resistant SRNS in LMIC, given the reasonable cost and good efficacy rates (58.6%).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.