Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37950923›Full record

SynthesisArchives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists2024

Normative Data Estimation in Neuropsychological Tests: A Systematic Review.

Ana delCacho-Tena, Bryan R Christ, Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla, Paul B Perrin, Diego Rivera, Laiene Olabarrieta-Landa

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cognitive Trajectories from Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease to Dementia.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Linguistic Barriers in U.S. Neuropsychological Assessment: A State-of-the-Art Review.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Apathy and Depression Impact on Cognitive Decline: Neuropsychological Specificities across Neurodegenerative Diseases.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Normative Data for Objective ADHD Smartphone Application in a General Population.Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana delCacho-TenaDepartment of Health Science, Public University of Navarre, Pamplona, Navarre, Spain.
Bryan R ChristSchool of Data Science and Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Juan Carlos Arango-LasprillaDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University. Richmond, VA, USA.
Paul B PerrinSchool of Data Science and Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Diego RiveraDepartment of Health Science, Public University of Navarre, Pamplona, Navarre, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7477-1893
Laiene Olabarrieta-LandaDepartment of Health Science, Public University of Navarre, Pamplona, Navarre, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8305-8720

Funding

Universidad Pública de Navarra
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo quantify the evolution, impact, and importance of normative data (ND) calculation by identifying trends in the research literature and what approaches need improvement.

methodsA PRISMA-guideline systematic review was performed on literature from 2000 to 2022 in PubMed, Pub-Psych, and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria included scientific articles about ND in neuropsychological tests with clear data analysis, published in any country, and written in English or Spanish. Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies were included. Bibliometric analysis was used to examine the growth, productivity, journal dispersion, and impact of the topic. VOSViewer compared keyword co-occurrence networks between 1952-1999 and 2000-2022.

resultsFour hundred twelve articles met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The most studied predictors were age, education, and sex. There were a greater number of studies/projects focusing on adults than children. The Verbal Fluency Test (12.7%) was the most studied test, and the most frequently used variable selection strategy was linear regression (49.5%). Regression-based approaches were widely used, whereas the traditional approach was still used. ND were presented mostly in percentiles (44.2%). Bibliometrics showed exponential growth in publications. Three journals (2.41%) were in the Core Zone. VOSViewer results showed small nodes, long distances, and four ND-related topics from 1952 to 1999, and there were larger nodes with short connections from 2000 to 2022, indicating topic spread.

conclusionsFuture studies should be conducted on children's ND, and alternative statistical methods should be used over the widely used regression approaches to address limitations and support growth of the field.

Indexed as

Neuropsychological TestsBibliometricsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesReference ValuesNeuropsychological testsNormative dataSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37950923
PMCPMC11042921

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.