Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37954071›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Late onset toxicities associated with the use of CDK 4/6 inhibitors in hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer patients: a multidisciplinary, pan-EU position paper regarding their optimal management. The GIOCONDA project.

Marina Elena Cazzaniga, Antonio Ciaccio, Romano Danesi, Francois P Duhoux, Corrado Girmenia, Kalhil Zaman, Henrik Lindman, Fabrizio Luppi, Dimitrios Mavroudis, Ida Paris and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Expert consensus on optimal management of liver-related adverse events during CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Marina Elena CazzanigaPhase 1 Research Unit, IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza (MB), Italy.
Antonio CiaccioSchool of Medicine and Surgery, Milano Bicocca University, Monza (MB), Italy.
Romano DanesiDepartment Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Francois P DuhouxCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UC Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Corrado GirmeniaDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Dermatology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Umberto I, Roma, Italy.
Kalhil ZamanBreast Center, Department Of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Henrik LindmanDepartment Of Immunology, Genetics And Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Fabrizio LuppiSchool of Medicine and Surgery, Milano Bicocca University, Monza (MB), Italy.
Dimitrios MavroudisDepartment Of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Of Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Ida ParisDepartment of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Ayodele OlubukolaUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Ahmed SamreenUniversity Hospitals Of Leicester Osborne Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Christian SchemMaHM Mammazentrum, Hamburg, Germany.
Christian SingerDepartment Of Obstetrics & Gynecology Head, Center For Breast Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Anton SnegovoyDepartment Of Oncology, University Of Medicine & Dentistry, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The personalization of therapies in breast cancer has favoured the introduction of new molecular-targeted therapies into clinical practice. Among them, cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have acquired increasing importance, with the approval in recent years of palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy. Currently, no guidelines are available to monitor and manage potential long-term toxicities associated with the use of these drugs. A multidisciplinary panel of European oncologists, was supported by a pharmacologist, a hematologist, a hepatologist and a pulmonologist to discuss the management of long-term toxicities, based on the literature review and their clinical experience. The panel provided detailed roadmaps to manage long-term toxicities associated with the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in clinical practice. Knowing the frequency and characteristics of the toxicity profile associated with each CDK4/6 inhibitor is important in the decision-making process to match the right drug to the right patient.

Indexed as

abemaciclibCDK 4/6 inhibitorsdiarrheainterstitial lung diseaseliver toxicity and injurypalbociclibribociclib

Identifiers

PMID37954071
PMCPMC10639170

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.