Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37955681›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2024

Substantial differences in perception of disease severity between post COVID-19 patients, internists, and psychiatrists or psychologists: the Health Perception Gap and its clinical implications.

Michael Ruzicka, Gerardo Jesus Ibarra Fonseca, Simone Sachenbacher, Fides Heimkes, Fabienne Grosse-Wentrup, Nora Wunderlich, Christopher Benesch, Anna Pernpruner, Elisabeth Valdinoci, Mike Rueb and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Michael RuzickaDepartment of Medicine III, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. michael.ruzicka@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2451-1070
Gerardo Jesus Ibarra FonsecaDepartment of Medicine IV, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Simone SachenbacherDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Fides HeimkesDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Fabienne Grosse-WentrupDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Nora WunderlichDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Christopher BeneschDepartment of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Anna PernprunerDepartment of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Elisabeth ValdinociDepartment of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Mike RuebDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2057-383X
Aline Olivia UebleisDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Susanne KarchDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Johannes BognerDepartment of Medicine IV, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8628-1533
Julia MayerleDepartment of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3666-6459
Michael von Bergwelt-BaildonDepartment of Medicine III, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1952-052X
Marion SubkleweDepartment of Medicine III, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9154-9469
Bernhard HeindlStabstelle Strategische Unternehmenssteuerung, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Hans Christian Stubbe *Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7873-996X
Kristina Adorjan *Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7501-9556

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) such as the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) or Likert scales addressing various domains of health are important tools to assess disease severity in Post COVID-19 (PC) patients. By design, they are subjective in nature and prone to bias. Our findings reveal substantial differences in the perception of disease severity between patients (PAT), their attending internists (INT) and psychiatrists/psychologists (PSY). Patients rated almost all aspects of their health worse than INT or PSY. Most of the differences were statistically highly significant. The presence of fatigue and mood disorders correlated negatively with health perception. The physical health section of the WHO Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQoL-BREF) and Karnofsky index correlated positively with overall and mental health ratings by PAT and INT. Health ratings by neither PAT, PSY nor INT were associated with the number of abnormal findings in diagnostic procedures. This study highlights how strongly perceptions of disease severity diverge between PC patients and attending medical staff. Imprecise communication, different experiences regarding health and disease, and confounding psychological factors may explain these observations. Discrepancies in disease perception threaten patient-physician relationships and pose strong confounders in clinical studies. Established scores (e.g., WHOQoL-BREF, Karnofsky index) may represent an approach to overcome these discrepancies. Physicians and psychologists noting harsh differences between a patient's and their own perception of the patient's health should apply screening tools for mood disorders (i.e., PHQ-9, WHOQoL-BREF), psychosomatic symptom burden (SSD-12, FCV-19) and consider further psychological evaluation. An interdisciplinary approach to PC patients remains imperative. Trial Registration Number & Date of Registration: DRKS00030974, 22 Dec 2022, retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

COVID-19PsychiatrySeverity of Illness IndexAdultAgedFemaleHumansInternal MedicineMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPsychiatristsPsychologyQuality of LifeDepressionDisease perceptionLong COVIDMental healthPost COVID-19 syndromePsychosomatic

Identifiers

PMID37955681
PMCPMC11579184

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.