Evidence mapPaperPMID 37958249Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

The Calculation and Evaluation of an Ultrasound-Estimated Fat Fraction in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease.

Pál Novák Kaposi, Zita Zsombor, Aladár D Rónaszéki, Bettina K Budai, Barbara Csongrády, Róbert Stollmayer, Ildikó Kalina, Gabriella Győri, Viktor Bérczi, Klára Werling and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pál Novák KaposiDepartment of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Korányi S. u. 2., 1083 Budapest, Hungary.
Zita ZsomborDepartment of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Korányi S. u. 2., 1083 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-2369-0329
Aladár D RónaszékiDepartment of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Korányi S. u. 2., 1083 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-2278-0058
Bettina K BudaiDepartment of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Korányi S. u. 2., 1083 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-3982-7887
Barbara CsongrádyDepartment of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Korányi S. u. 2., 1083 Budapest, Hungary.
Róbert StollmayerDepartment of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Korányi S. u. 2., 1083 Budapest, Hungary.
Ildikó KalinaDepartment of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Korányi S. u. 2., 1083 Budapest, Hungary.
Gabriella GyőriDepartment of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Korányi S. u. 2., 1083 Budapest, Hungary.
Viktor BércziDepartment of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Korányi S. u. 2., 1083 Budapest, Hungary.
Klára WerlingDepartment of Surgery, Transplantation and Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 78., 1082 Budapest, Hungary.
Pál Maurovich-HorvatDepartment of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Korányi S. u. 2., 1083 Budapest, Hungary.
Anikó FolhofferDepartment of Internal Medicine and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Korányi S. u. 2/A., 1083 Budapest, Hungary.
Krisztina HagymásiDepartment of Surgery, Transplantation and Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Üllői út 78., 1082 Budapest, Hungary.
Semmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to develop a non-linear regression model that could predict the fat fraction of the liver (UEFF), similar to magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF), based on quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters. We measured and retrospectively collected the ultrasound attenuation coefficient (AC), backscatter-distribution coefficient (BSC-D), and liver stiffness (LS) using shear wave elastography (SWE) in 90 patients with clinically suspected non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and 51 patients with clinically suspected metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). The MRI-PDFF was also measured in all patients within a month of the ultrasound scan. In the linear regression analysis, only AC and BSC-D showed a significant association with MRI-PDFF. Therefore, we developed prediction models using non-linear least squares analysis to estimate MRI-PDFF based on the AC and BSC-D parameters. We fitted the models on the NAFLD dataset and evaluated their performance in three-fold cross-validation repeated five times. We decided to use the model based on both parameters to calculate UEFF. The correlation between UEFF and MRI-PDFF was strong in NAFLD and very strong in MAFLD. According to a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis, UEFF could differentiate between <5% vs. ≥5% and <10% vs. ≥10% MRI-PDFF steatosis with excellent, 0.97 and 0.91 area under the curve (AUC), accuracy in the NAFLD and with AUCs of 0.99 and 0.96 in the MAFLD groups. In conclusion, UEFF calculated from QUS parameters is an accurate method to quantify liver fat fraction and to diagnose ≥5% and ≥10% steatosis in both NAFLD and MAFLD. Therefore, UEFF can be an ideal non-invasive screening tool for patients with NAFLD and MAFLD risk factors.

Indexed as

attenuation coefficientbackscatter-distribution coefficienthepatic steatosisliver stiffnessmetabolic-associated fatty liver diseasenon-alcoholic fatty liver diseaseproton density fat fractionquantitative ultrasoundultrasound-estimated fat fraction

Identifiers

PMID37958249
PMCPMC10648816
OpenAlexW4388041277

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.