ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023
Olfactory impairment and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular outcomes in older adults.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Olfactory impairment is common in older adults and may be associated with adverse cardiovascular health; however, empirical evidence is sparse. Objective: To examine olfaction and the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, and congestive heart failure (CHF). Methods: This study included 2,537 older adults (aged 75.6±2.8 years) from the Health ABC Study with olfaction assessed by the 12-item Brief Smell Identification Test in 1999-2000, defined as poor (score ≤8), moderate (9-10), or good (11-12). The outcomes were incident CHD, stroke, and CHF. Results: During up to 12-year follow-up, 353 incident CHD, 258 stroke, and 477 CHF events were identified. Olfaction was associated with incident CHF, but not with CHD or stroke. After adjusting for demographics, the cause-specific hazard ratio (HR) of CHF was 1.35 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08, 1.70) for moderate and 1.39 (95%CI: 1.09, 1.76) for poor olfaction. With additional adjustment for lifestyle, chronic diseases, and biomarkers of CHF, the HR was modestly attenuated to 1.32 (95%CI: 1.05, 1.66) for moderate and 1.28 (95%CI: 1.01, 1.64) for poor olfaction. These associations were robust in pre-planned subgroup analyses by age, sex, race, and prevalent CHD/stroke. However, the associations appeared to be evident among participants who reported very-good-to-excellent health (HR=1.47 (95%CI: 1.02, 2.13) for moderate and 1.76, (95%CI: 1.20, 2.57) for poor olfaction). In contrast, null association with CHF was found among those with fair-to-poor self-reported health. Conclusions: In community-dwelling older adults, a single olfaction test was associated with a long-term risk for incident CHF, particularly among those reporting very-good-to-excellent health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.