ArticleFEBS open bio2024
Predicting cysteine reactivity changes upon phosphorylation using XGBoost.
Article in FEBS open bio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structure-based rational design of covalent probes.Communications chemistry · 2025Review
- CIAA: Integrated Proteomics and Structural Modeling for Understanding Cysteine Reactivity with Iodoacetamide Alkyne.ACS chemical biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cysteine reactivity serves as a significant indicator of protein function and can be affected by phosphorylation events. Experimental approaches have been developed to investigate this effect, but the scale is still relatively limited. Machine-learning approaches promise to accelerate the investigation of these phenomena. In this study, protein sequence information, distances to the closest phosphorylation sites, and the membership score of the intrinsically disordered region were used to represent the cysteine. Following the feature selection using an elastic net model, two groups of binary classifiers based on XGBoost were built to predict the occurrence and the direction of the reactivity change as a response to phosphorylation events, respectively. In addition, function enrichment analysis was performed on proteins/genes predicted to have reactivity changes. XGBoost performed the best in the independent test with AUC of 0.8192 and 0.9203 for the prediction of the change's occurrence and direction, respectively. The use of two binary classifiers successively resulted in an accuracy of 0.7568 in predicting whether reactivity would be unchanged, increased, or decreased. The enrichment analysis revealed the association of proteins carrying reactivity-changed cysteine residues with various disease-related pathways, particularly cancer, autosomal dominant diseases, and viral infections. Changes in cysteine reactivity influenced by phosphorylation are site-specific and can be predicted by XGBoost algorithms. Our model provides an efficient alternative way to explore the cysteine reactivity upon phosphorylation at the proteome-wide level, facilitating the investigation of protein functions and their clinical insights. Our code is available on GitHub (https://github.com/DarinaOsamu/predictors-of-cysteine-reactivity-changes).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.