ArticleFEBS open bio2024
Computational analysis of protein-protein interactions of cancer drivers in renal cell carcinoma.
Article in FEBS open bio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bridging structure and function: artificial intelligence-based modelling of kidney proteins.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026Review
- Disrupting the Undruggable: Emerging Modalities for Targeting Protein-Protein Interactions in Oncology.Biology · 2026Review
- Applying biotechnology to overcome cancer drug resistance and improve public health outcomes.Osong public health and research perspectives · 2026Article
- Selective disruption of DNMT1/ELK1 interactions induces DGKI re-expression and promotes temozolomide sensitivity of MGMTClinical epigenetics · 2025Article
- Identifying potential risk genes for clear cell renal cell carcinoma with deep reinforcement learning.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Multimeric protein interaction and complex prediction: Structure, dynamics and function.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of kidney cancer with rising cases in recent years. Extensive research has identified various cancer driver proteins associated with different subtypes of RCC. Most RCC drivers are encoded by tumor suppressor genes and exhibit enrichment in functional categories such as protein degradation, chromatin remodeling, and transcription. To further our understanding of RCC, we utilized powerful deep-learning methods based on AlphaFold to predict protein-protein interactions (PPIs) involving RCC drivers. We predicted high-confidence complexes formed by various RCC drivers, including TCEB1, KMT2C/D and KDM6A of the COMPASS-related complexes, TSC1 of the MTOR pathway, and TRRAP. These predictions provide valuable structural insights into the interaction interfaces, some of which are promising targets for cancer drug design, such as the NRF2-MAFK interface. Cancer somatic missense mutations from large datasets of genome sequencing of RCCs were mapped to the interfaces of predicted and experimental structures of PPIs involving RCC drivers, and their effects on the binding affinity were evaluated. We observed more than 100 cancer somatic mutations affecting the binding affinity of complexes formed by key RCC drivers such as VHL and TCEB1. These findings emphasize the importance of these mutations in RCC pathogenesis and potentially offer new avenues for targeted therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.