ArticleHeliyon2023
Comparative analysis of allele frequencies of 15 deafness gene variants between hearing-loss and normal populations in Henan, China.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hearing loss is found in more than 5 % of cases worldwide. Hearing loss is divided into three types: Sensorineural hearing loss, Combined hearing loss and Conductive hearing loss. Among them, no less than 50 % of pediatric cases of sensorineural hearing loss are genetic. In Henan, China, there are no statistics on the allele frequency of deafness gene variants. Methods: We divided 2178 subjects enrolled at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou College from January 2019 to March 2021 into a hearing loss group and a normal control group. We performed array and pathogenicity classification for screening the 15 deafness gene variants, calculated and compared the allele frequency of the deafness gene variants, and then compared the hearing loss diagnosis rate between the hearing loss group and the normal control group. Results: We found that in the hearing loss group, the overall allele frequency of all detected variants was 16.6 %. Comparative analysis showed that the allele frequencies of Conclusions: These results support genetic counseling and rational prediction of risk for deafness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.