Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37965243›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2023

Artificial intelligence to support out-of-hospital cardiac arrest care: A scoping review.

Jake Toy, Nichole Bosson, Shira Schlesinger, Marianne Gausche-Hill, Samuel Stratton

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Artificial intelligence in resuscitation - transforming emergency care in the digital age.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Words to live by: Using medic impressions to identify the need for prehospital lifesaving interventions.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jake ToyUniversity of California Los Angeles, Fielding School of Public Health, 650 Charles E Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Nichole BossonHarbor-UCLA Department of Emergency Medicine & The Lundquist Research Institute, 1000 W Carson Street, Torrance, CA 90502, USA.
Shira SchlesingerHarbor-UCLA Department of Emergency Medicine & The Lundquist Research Institute, 1000 W Carson Street, Torrance, CA 90502, USA.
Marianne Gausche-HillHarbor-UCLA Department of Emergency Medicine & The Lundquist Research Institute, 1000 W Carson Street, Torrance, CA 90502, USA.
Samuel StrattonUniversity of California Los Angeles, Fielding School of Public Health, 650 Charles E Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated significant potential in supporting emergency medical services personnel during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) care; however, the extent of research evaluating this topic is unknown. This scoping review examines the breadth of literature on the application of AI in early OHCA care. Methods: We conducted a search of PubMed®, Embase, and Web of Science in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Articles focused on non-traumatic OHCA and published prior to January 18th, 2023 were included. Studies were excluded if they did not use an AI intervention (including machine learning, deep learning, or natural language processing), or did not utilize data from the prehospital phase of care. Results: Of 173 unique articles identified, 54 (31%) were included after screening. Of these studies, 15 (28%) were from the year 2022 and with an increasing trend annually starting in 2019. The majority were carried out by multinational collaborations (20/54, 38%) with additional studies from the United States (10/54, 19%), Korea (5/54, 10%), and Spain (3/54, 6%). Studies were classified into three major categories including ECG waveform classification and outcome prediction (24/54, 44%), early dispatch-level detection and outcome prediction (7/54, 13%), return of spontaneous circulation and survival outcome prediction (15/54, 20%), and other (9/54, 16%). All but one study had a retrospective design. Conclusions: A small but growing body of literature exists describing the use of AI to augment early OHCA care.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningEmergency medical servicesMachine learningMedical dispatchOut-of-hospital cardiac arrestPrehospital care

Identifiers

PMID37965243
PMCPMC10641545

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.