Evidence mapPaperPMID 37967952Full record

ArticleJournal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis2024

Validation of the 2022 Clinical Diagnostic Criteria of Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Japan.

Hayato Tada, Atsushi Nohara, Soichiro Usui, Kenji Sakata, Masa-Aki Kawashiri, Masayuki Takamura

Open access · diamondAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hayato TadaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University.
Atsushi NoharaDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital.
Soichiro UsuiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University.
Kenji SakataDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University.
Masa-Aki KawashiriDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kaga Medical Center.
Masayuki TakamuraDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University.
Kanazawa University · JPIshikawa Prefectural Central Hospital · JPShiga Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimIn 2022, the Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) has revised its clinical diagnostic criteria of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and adopted the use of definite, probable, possible, and unlikely FH according to the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) FH criteria. However, these strata have not been validated and their impact on coronary artery disease (CAD) is yet to be elucidated.

methodsIn this study, we retrospectively examined the patients with FH aged ≥ 15 years (N=857, male=431) who were admitted to Kanazawa University Hospital between 2010 and 2022. We assessed the prevalence of patients with a pathogenic variant as FH and odds ratio (OR) of CAD among each group determined by the JAS criteria 2022 for adults.

resultsIn total, 414, 128, 142, and 173 patients were found to have definite, probable, possible, and unlikely FH, respectively, in this population. The prevalences of patients with a pathogenic variant as FH were 77.1%, 28.7%, 13.0%, and 1.2 %, respectively, among the definite, probable, possible, and unlikely FH patients (P-trend <0.001). Compared with the reference group of unlikely FH, patients with definite, probable, and possible FH were noted to have significantly higher adjusted odds of developing CAD (OR, 9.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2-12.6; P<0.001 and OR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.7-6.4; P<0.001, and OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.2-4.4; P=0.002, respectively).

conclusionThe new JAS diagnostic criteria for FH have been noted to work well in terms of diagnosing definitive, probable, or possible FH patients. Thus, it is seen to be of great help in terms of risk discrimination.

Indexed as

Hyperlipoproteinemia Type IIAdolescentAdultAgedCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedPrevalencePrognosisRetrospective StudiesFamilial hypercholesterolemiaGeneticsGuidelineLDL cholesterolLDL receptor

Identifiers

PMID37967952
PMCPMC11079493
OpenAlexW4388651719

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.