ArticleJournal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis2024
Validation of the 2022 Clinical Diagnostic Criteria of Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Japan.
Article in Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Improved Prognosis in Subjects With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia Associated With Advances in LDL-Lowering Therapy.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2026Article
- The Mysterious Question on Discordance between Achilles Tendon Thickness Assessed by Ultrasound and X-ray Has been Solved.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2026Article
- Low-Density-Lipoprotein Cholesterol Control and Treatment Status 1 Year after the Initial Health Checkup in Individuals with Referral-Level LDL Cholesterol.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2026Article
- Comorbidities and Molecular Genetics Status in Familial and Nonfamilial Hypercholesterolemia: A Single-Center Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Observational
- Combined Use of Statin and PCSK9 Inhibitor in a Pregnant Woman with Possible Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Coronary Artery Stenosis.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2025Article
- The First Japanese Case of Familial Hypercholesterolemia Caused by an apolipoprotein E (APOE) p.Leu167del Mutation.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Article
- Assessment Timings of Polygenic Risk Score for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2024Article
- Impact of changes in Achilles tendon thickening on cardiovascular events in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimIn 2022, the Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) has revised its clinical diagnostic criteria of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and adopted the use of definite, probable, possible, and unlikely FH according to the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) FH criteria. However, these strata have not been validated and their impact on coronary artery disease (CAD) is yet to be elucidated.
methodsIn this study, we retrospectively examined the patients with FH aged ≥ 15 years (N=857, male=431) who were admitted to Kanazawa University Hospital between 2010 and 2022. We assessed the prevalence of patients with a pathogenic variant as FH and odds ratio (OR) of CAD among each group determined by the JAS criteria 2022 for adults.
resultsIn total, 414, 128, 142, and 173 patients were found to have definite, probable, possible, and unlikely FH, respectively, in this population. The prevalences of patients with a pathogenic variant as FH were 77.1%, 28.7%, 13.0%, and 1.2 %, respectively, among the definite, probable, possible, and unlikely FH patients (P-trend <0.001). Compared with the reference group of unlikely FH, patients with definite, probable, and possible FH were noted to have significantly higher adjusted odds of developing CAD (OR, 9.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2-12.6; P<0.001 and OR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.7-6.4; P<0.001, and OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.2-4.4; P=0.002, respectively).
conclusionThe new JAS diagnostic criteria for FH have been noted to work well in terms of diagnosing definitive, probable, or possible FH patients. Thus, it is seen to be of great help in terms of risk discrimination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.