Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37968655›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2023

DeepAutoGlioma: a deep learning autoencoder-based multi-omics data integration and classification tools for glioma subtyping.

Sana Munquad, Asim Bikas Das

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Multi-Omics Integration for Advancing Glioma Precision Medicine.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Artificial Intelligence-Driven Multi-Omics Approaches in Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sana MunquadDepartment of Biotechnology, National Institute of Technology Warangal, Warangal, Telangana, 506004, India.
Asim Bikas DasDepartment of Biotechnology, National Institute of Technology Warangal, Warangal, Telangana, 506004, India. asimbikas@nitw.ac.in.
National Institute of Technology Warangal · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveThe classification of glioma subtypes is essential for precision therapy. Due to the heterogeneity of gliomas, the subtype-specific molecular pattern can be captured by integrating and analyzing high-throughput omics data from different genomic layers. The development of a deep-learning framework enables the integration of multi-omics data to classify the glioma subtypes to support the clinical diagnosis.

resultsTranscriptome and methylome data of glioma patients were preprocessed, and differentially expressed features from both datasets were identified. Subsequently, a Cox regression analysis determined genes and CpGs associated with survival. Gene set enrichment analysis was carried out to examine the biological significance of the features. Further, we identified CpG and gene pairs by mapping them in the promoter region of corresponding genes. The methylation and gene expression levels of these CpGs and genes were embedded in a lower-dimensional space with an autoencoder. Next, ANN and CNN were used to classify subtypes using the latent features from embedding space. CNN performs better than ANN for subtyping lower-grade gliomas (LGG) and glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). The subtyping accuracy of CNN was 98.03% (± 0.06) and 94.07% (± 0.01) in LGG and GBM, respectively. The precision of the models was 97.67% in LGG and 90.40% in GBM. The model sensitivity was 96.96% in LGG and 91.18% in GBM. Additionally, we observed the superior performance of CNN with external datasets. The genes and CpGs pairs used to develop the model showed better performance than the random CpGs-gene pairs, preprocessed data, and single omics data.

conclusionsThe current study showed that a novel feature selection and data integration strategy led to the development of DeepAutoGlioma, an effective framework for diagnosing glioma subtypes.

Indexed as

AutoencoderConvolutional neural network (CNN)Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)Lower-grade glioma (LGG)Multi-omics

Identifiers

PMID37968655
PMCPMC10652591
OpenAlexW4388692373

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.