ArticleBioData mining2023
DeepAutoGlioma: a deep learning autoencoder-based multi-omics data integration and classification tools for glioma subtyping.
Article in BioData mining, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multimodal deep learning for predicting neoadjuvant treatment outcomes in breast cancer: a systematic review.Biology direct · 2025Pooled it
- Ligand-Receptor Interaction Combined with Histopathology Improves Glioma Prognostic Model.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Integrating multiomics data using a correlation based graph attention network for subtype classification in lower grade glioma.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- From Data to Decision: Integrating Bioinformatics into Glioma Patient Stratification and Immunotherapy Selection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Multi-Omics Integration for Advancing Glioma Precision Medicine.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Review
- Biologically explainable multi-omics feature demonstrates greater learning potential by identifying tissue of origin, stages, and subtypes for pan-cancer classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- DNA methylation profile to aid in the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and its role in disease progression.Epigenomics · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Multi-Omics Approaches in Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Review
- Explainable Machine Learning Models for Glioma Subtype Classification and Survival Prediction.Cancers · 2025Article
- A technical review of multi-omics data integration methods: from classical statistical to deep generative approaches.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Deep learning-based approaches for multi-omics data integration and analysis.BioData mining · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence methods available for cancer research.Frontiers of medicine · 2024Review
- Inferring gene regulatory networks with graph convolutional network based on causal feature reconstruction.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveThe classification of glioma subtypes is essential for precision therapy. Due to the heterogeneity of gliomas, the subtype-specific molecular pattern can be captured by integrating and analyzing high-throughput omics data from different genomic layers. The development of a deep-learning framework enables the integration of multi-omics data to classify the glioma subtypes to support the clinical diagnosis.
resultsTranscriptome and methylome data of glioma patients were preprocessed, and differentially expressed features from both datasets were identified. Subsequently, a Cox regression analysis determined genes and CpGs associated with survival. Gene set enrichment analysis was carried out to examine the biological significance of the features. Further, we identified CpG and gene pairs by mapping them in the promoter region of corresponding genes. The methylation and gene expression levels of these CpGs and genes were embedded in a lower-dimensional space with an autoencoder. Next, ANN and CNN were used to classify subtypes using the latent features from embedding space. CNN performs better than ANN for subtyping lower-grade gliomas (LGG) and glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). The subtyping accuracy of CNN was 98.03% (± 0.06) and 94.07% (± 0.01) in LGG and GBM, respectively. The precision of the models was 97.67% in LGG and 90.40% in GBM. The model sensitivity was 96.96% in LGG and 91.18% in GBM. Additionally, we observed the superior performance of CNN with external datasets. The genes and CpGs pairs used to develop the model showed better performance than the random CpGs-gene pairs, preprocessed data, and single omics data.
conclusionsThe current study showed that a novel feature selection and data integration strategy led to the development of DeepAutoGlioma, an effective framework for diagnosing glioma subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.