Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37970474›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2023

Overview on the endoscopic treatment for obesity: A review.

Maheeba Abdulla, Nafeesa Mohammed, Jehad AlQamish

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Advances and future directions in endoscopic bariatric therapies.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Analysis of Body Mass Index and Clinicopathological Factors in Patients with Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maheeba AbdullaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ibn Al Nafees Hospital, Manama 54533, Bahrain. amaheeba@hotmail.com.
Nafeesa MohammedDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Salmaniya Medical Complex, Manama 5616, Bahrain.
Jehad AlQamishDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ibn Al Nafees Hospital, Manama 54533, Bahrain.
International Hospital of Bahrain · BHSalmaniya Medical Complex · BH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity rates have increased, and so has the need for more specific treatments. This trend has raised interest in non-surgical weight loss techniques that are novel, safe, and straightforward. Thus, the present review describes the endoscopic bariatric treatment for obesity, its most recent supporting data, the questions it raises, and its future directions. Various endoscopic bariatric therapies for weight reduction, such as intragastric balloons (IGBs), aspiration therapy (AT), small bowel endoscopy, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty, endoluminal procedures, malabsorption endoscopic procedures, and methods of regulating gastric emptying, were explored through literature sourced from different databases. IGBs, AT, and small bowel endoscopy have short-term effects with a possibility of weight regain. Minor adverse events have occurred; however, all procedures reduce weight. Vomiting and nausea are common side effects, although serious complications have also been observed.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryGastroplastyObesity, MorbidEndoscopy, GastrointestinalGastric EmptyingHumansObesityTreatment OutcomeWeight LossGastric bypassIntragastric balloonsMalabsorptionOverweight

Identifiers

PMID37970474
PMCPMC10642436
OpenAlexW4387972384

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.