Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37974941›Full record

ArticleACS medicinal chemistry letters2023

Design and Biological Evaluation of Piperazine-Bearing Nitrobenzamide Hypoxia/GDEPT Prodrugs: The Discovery of CP-506.

Amir Ashoorzadeh, Alexandra M Mowday, Maria R Abbattista, Christopher P Guise, Matthew R Bull, Shevan Silva, Adam V Patterson, Jeff B Smaill

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS medicinal chemistry letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Tumor-Selective and Chemical Activation Strategies for Nitrogen Mustard Prodrugs.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amir AshoorzadehAuckland Cancer Society Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Alexandra M MowdayAuckland Cancer Society Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7480-9580
Maria R AbbattistaAuckland Cancer Society Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Christopher P GuiseAuckland Cancer Society Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Matthew R BullAuckland Cancer Society Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Shevan SilvaAuckland Cancer Society Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Adam V PattersonAuckland Cancer Society Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Jeff B SmaillAuckland Cancer Society Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
University of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Off-target aerobic activation of PR-104A by human aldo-keto reductase 1C3 (AKR1C3) has confounded the development of this dual hypoxia/gene therapy prodrug. Previous attempts to design prodrugs resistant to AKR1C3 activation have resulted in candidates that require further optimization. Herein we report the evaluation of a lipophilic series of PR-104A analogues in which a piperazine moiety has been introduced to improve drug-like properties. Octanol-water partition coefficients (LogD

Identifiers

PMID37974941
PMCPMC10641903
OpenAlexW4387360637

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.