ReviewBiophysical reviews2023
The use of a chemiluminescence in the assessment of the nanomaterials antioxidant activity.
Review in Biophysical reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ligand-to-Metal Ratio Governs Radical-Scavenging Ability of Malate-Stabilised Ceria Nanoparticles.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- VII Congress of Russian Biophysicists-2023, Krasnodar, Russia.Biophysical reviews · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanomaterials are one of the most promising classes of advanced materials with fine-tuned biological activities. This is evidenced by the presence of redox activity of a number of nanoparticles aimed at inhibiting free radicals and/or mimicking the functions of enzymes. At the same time, it is impossible to study the expression of these biological properties without the use of well-standardized, representative techniques that provide availability, high precision, sensitivity, and selectivity of the measured characteristics. A method that satisfies these requirements is chemiluminescence analysis, which is widely used both in clinical analysis and to characterize the antioxidant activity of substances of natural or synthetic origin. Recently, a trend of using chemiluminescence analysis to study the biological activity of nanomaterials has appeared as a suitable alternative to spectroscopic and electrochemical techniques. This review briefly describes the examples of successful applications of chemiluminescence methods to study radical-binding and enzyme-like activities of nanomaterials. We discuss the data about the effect of the used reagents (radical-generating systems, chemiluminescence activators) and experimental conditions on the obtained values characterizing the nanomaterials activity. Graphical Abstract:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.