Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37977659›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2024

Recruitment and retention of staff in rural dispensing primary care practice: a qualitative inquiry.

Rosina Cross, Sinead Tj McDonagh, Emma Cockcroft, Malcolm Turner, Matthew Isom, Robert Lambourn, John L Campbell, Christopher E Clark

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Access to general practice: why policy must be rural-proofed.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Rosina CrossExeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care, Department of Health and Community Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK r.cross2@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2548-2398
Sinead Tj McDonaghExeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care, Department of Health and Community Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0283-3095
Emma CockcroftExeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care, Department of Health and Community Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3798-9492
Malcolm TurnerExeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care, Department of Health and Community Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Matthew IsomDispensing Doctors' Association Limited, North Yorkshire, UK.
Robert LambournCheviot Primary Care Centre, Wooler, Northumberland, UK.
John L CampbellExeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care, Department of Health and Community Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6752-3493
Christopher E ClarkExeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care, Department of Health and Community Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7526-3038
University of Exeter · GBChinese Medical Doctor Association · CNMuseums Northumberland · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRural primary care practices struggle to employ and retain staff, and existing literature regarding recruitment and retention is focused on doctors. Shortages of qualified staff affect practice functioning, quality of care, and patient experience. Dispensing of medications is a rural service valued by patients. However, little is known about how dispensing services are valued by practices or related to the recruitment and retention of staff.

aimTo understand barriers to, and facilitators of, joining and remaining in rural dispensing practice employment, and to explore how rural practices value dispensing services. DESIGN &

settingQualitative inquiry in rural primary care practices across England.

methodSemi-structured interviews with rural dispensing staff were undertaken, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using framework analysis.

resultsIn total, 17 staff from 12 practices across England were interviewed between June and November 2021. Reasons for taking up employment in rural dispensing practices included perceived career autonomy, development opportunities, and preference for working and living in a rural setting. Skills required for dispensers' roles balanced against low wages were a barrier to recruitment. For nurses, barriers included perceived lack of knowledge around their role in rural care. Revenue from dispensing, opportunities for staff development, job satisfaction, and positive work environments drove retention of staff. However, negative perceptions of rural practice, travel difficulties, lack of applicants, and insufficient remuneration for roles were barriers to retention.

conclusionBarriers to, and facilitators of, rural primary care recruitment and retention vary by role, and include factors unique to the rural setting.

Indexed as

dispensingpharmacyPrimary health carequalitative researchrural health servicesworkforce

Identifiers

PMID37977659
PMCPMC11169991
OpenAlexW4388763070

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.