Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37978433›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2023

Implementation strategies for large scale quality improvement initiatives in primary care settings: a qualitative assessment.

Debora Goetz Goldberg, Constance Owens-Jasey, Sahar Haghighat, Sneha Kavalloor

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03054090 (Restoring Primary Care in Virginia), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03054090 nacompletednot on this map

Restoring Primary Care in Virginia: PCOR Learning as a Pathway to Value

TypeinterventionalSponsorVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRan2015 to 2018Enrolled231ConditionsCardiovascular DiseasesArmsQuality Improvement Support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Debora Goetz GoldbergDepartment of Health Administration and Policy, Affiliate Faculty, Center for Evidence-Based Behavioral Health, Department of Psychology, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive MS IJ3, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA. dgoldbe4@gmu.edu.
Constance Owens-JaseyDepartment of Health Administration and Policy, Affiliate Faculty, Center for Evidence-Based Behavioral Health, Department of Psychology, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive MS IJ3, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA.
Sahar HaghighatDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, 3G5, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA.
Sneha KavalloorDepartment of Health Administration and Policy, Affiliate Faculty, Center for Evidence-Based Behavioral Health, Department of Psychology, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive MS IJ3, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA.

Funding

Restoring Primary Care in Virginia: PCOR Learning as a Pathway to ValueR18HS023913 · AHRQ · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI KUZEL, ANTON J · 2015 to 2017
$9.4M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS023913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe EvidenceNOW: Advancing Heart Health in Primary Care was designed to assist primary care practices in the US in implementing evidence-based practices in cardiovascular care and building capacity for quality improvement. EvidenceNOW, NCT03054090, was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on 15/02/2017. The goals of this study were to gain a comprehensive understanding of perspectives from research participants and research team members on the value of implementation strategies and factors that influenced the EvidenceNOW initiative in Virginia.

methodsIn 2018, we conducted 25 focus groups with clinicians and staff at participating practices, including 80 physicians, advanced practice clinicians, practice managers and other practice staff. We also conducted face-to-face and telephone interviews with 22 research team members, including lead investigators, practice facilitators, physician expert consultants, and evaluators. We used the integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in the Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework in our qualitative data analysis and organization of themes.

resultsImplementation strategies valued by both practice representatives and research team members included the kick-off event, on-site practice facilitation, and interaction with physician expert consultants. Remote practice facilitation and web-based tools were used less frequently. Contextual factors that influence quality improvement efforts include leadership support, access to resources, previous quality improvement experience, and practice ownership type (independent compared to health system owned). Many clinicians and staff were overwhelmed by day-to-day activities and experience initiative fatigue, which hindered their ability to fully participate in the EvidenceNOW initiative.

conclusionsThis study provides details on how the practice environment plays an essential role in the implementation of evidence-based practices in primary care. Future efforts to improve quality in primary care practices should consider the context and environment of individual practices, with targeted implementation strategies to meet the needs of independent and health system owned practices. Future efforts to improve quality in primary care practices require strategies to address initiative fatigue among clinicians and practice staff. External support for building capacity for quality improvement could help primary care practices implement and sustain evidence-based practices and improve quality of care.

trial registrationThis project was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on 15/02/2017 and the identifier is NCT03054090.

Indexed as

PhysiciansQuality ImprovementEvidence-Based PracticeHumansPrimary Health CareResearch DesignEvidence-based practice; qualitative researchImplementationPrimary careQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID37978433
PMCPMC10655333

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.