Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37982368›Full record

ArticleResearch in nursing & health2024

Understanding healthcare engagement for people who inject drugs.

Omeid Heidari, Abigail Winiker, Derek T Dangerfield, Jennifer Wenzel, Tamar Rodney, Shruti Mehta, Becky Genberg

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in nursing & health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Omeid HeidariDepartment of Child, Family, and Population Health Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4563-4029
Abigail WinikerDepartment of Health, Behavior, and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Derek T DangerfieldDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Jennifer WenzelSchool of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Tamar RodneySchool of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Shruti MehtaDepartment of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Becky GenbergDepartment of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Johns Hopkins University · USMilken Institute · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

The AIDS Linked to the Intravenous Experience (ALIVE) StudyU01DA036297 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Gregory D Kirk, Shruti H Mehta · 2014 to 2026
$28.9M
NCCIH Supplement to NCATS/CTSA Program for KL2 Scholars - M. SoddersKL2TR002317 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Christy Michelle McKinney · 2017 to 2026
$14.5M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002317NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA036297NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People who inject drugs (PWID) are at an increased risk of multimorbid mental health and chronic diseases, which are frequently underdiagnosed and under-treated due to systemic barriers and ongoing substance use. Healthcare engagement is essential to address these conditions and prevent excess morbidity and mortality. The goal of this study was to understand how PWID engage in care for their chronic health conditions and substance use treatment given the known historic and pervasive barriers. We conducted 24 semistructured qualitative interviews informed by the Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations between July-September 2019. Participants were sampled across a range of comorbidities, including co-occurring mental health disorders. Thematic analysis was conducted to explore experiences of healthcare engagement for multimorbid chronic diseases, mental health, and treatment for substance use disorder. Mean age for participants was 58 years; 63% reported male sex and 83% reported Black race. Interviews yielded themes regarding healthcare access and wraparound services, positive patient-provider relationships, service integration for substance use treatment and mental health, healthcare needs alignment, medication of opioid use disorder stigma, and acceptance of healthcare. Taken together, participants described how these themes enabled healthcare engagement. Engagement in care is crucial to support health and recovery. Clinical implications include the importance of strengthening patient-provider relationships, encouraging integration of medical and mental health services, and counseling on substance use treatment options in a non- stigmatizing manner. Additionally, policy to reimburse wrap-around support for substance use recovery can improve care engagement and outcomes related to chronic diseases, mental health, and substance use among PWID. No Patient or Public Contribution: While we acknowledge and thank ALIVE participants for their time for data collection and sharing their perspectives, no ALIVE participants, other people who use drugs, and service users were involved in data collection, analysis or interpretation of data, or in preparation of the manuscript.

Indexed as

Drug UsersSubstance Abuse, IntravenousChronic DiseaseHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health Careintegrated caremental healthpatient–provider relationshipsubstance‐use treatment

Identifiers

PMID37982368
PMCPMC10961200
OpenAlexW4388831556

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.