Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37987039›Full record

ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2023

[Short-term effectiveness of orthopedic robot-assisted resection for osteoid osteoma].

Zhuoyu Li, Weifeng Liu, Zhiping Deng, Tao Jin, Yang Sun, Yongkun Yang, Yuan Li, Fajun Yang, Feng Yu, Lin Hao and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhuoyu LiPeking University Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, 100035, P. R. China.
Weifeng LiuDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, 100035, P. R. China.
Zhiping DengDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, 100035, P. R. China.
Tao JinDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, 100035, P. R. China.
Yang SunDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, 100035, P. R. China.
Yongkun YangDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, 100035, P. R. China.
Yuan LiDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, 100035, P. R. China.
Fajun YangDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, 100035, P. R. China.
Feng YuDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, 100035, P. R. China.
Lin HaoDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, 100035, P. R. China.
Qing ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, 100035, P. R. China.
Xiaohui NiuDepartment of Orthopaedic Oncology Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, 100035, P. R. China.
Peking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate short-term effectiveness and clinical application advantages of orthopedic robot-assisted resection for osteoid osteoma compared with traditional open surgery. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data of 48 osteoid osteoma patients who met the selection criteria between July 2022 and April 2023. Among them, 23 patients underwent orthopedic robot-assisted resection (robot-assisted surgery group), and 25 patients received traditional open surgery (traditional surgery group). There was no significant difference ( Results: All patients completed the surgery successfully, with no significant difference in surgical time between the two groups ( Conclusion: Orthopedic robot-assisted osteoid osteoma resection achieves similar short-term effectiveness when compared to traditional open surgery, with shorter lesion localization time.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsOsteoma, OsteoidRoboticsBlood Loss, SurgicalHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomecase-control studyopen surgeryorthopedic robotOsteoid osteoma

Identifiers

PMID37987039
PMCPMC10662405
OpenAlexW4388869782

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.