Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37990673›Full record

ArticleObesity pillars2022

Obesity Pillars Roundtable: Body mass index and body composition in Black and Female individuals. Race-relevant or racist? Sex-relevant or sexist?

Harold Edward Bays, Sylvia Gonsahn-Bollie, Courtney Younglove, Sean Wharton

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity pillars, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Time to Address Eating Disorder Risk Among Medical Students.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Beyond smoking: The role of stigma in asthma rates among youth.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Effect of Diet on HDL in Obesity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Harold Edward BaysAmerican Board of Obesity Medicine, Medical Director / President Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center Clinical Associate Professor / University of Louisville Medical School, 3288 Illinois Avenue Louisville KY, 40213, USA.
Sylvia Gonsahn-BollieAmerican Board of Obesity Medicine, Embrace You Weight & Wellness Founder, Black Physicians Healthcare Network, Council of Black Obesity Physicians Founding Member, 8705 Colesville Rd Suite 103, Silver Spring, MD, 20910, USA.
Courtney YoungloveAmerican Board of Obesity Medicine, Founder/Medical Director: Heartland Weight Loss, 14205 Metcalf Avenue Overland Park, KS, 66223, USA.
Sean WhartonMcMaster University, York University, University of Toronto Wharton Medical Clinic 2951 Walker's Line, Burlington,Ontario, Canada.
Obesity Medicine Association · USUniversity of Louisville · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Body mass index (BMI or weight in kilograms/height in meters Methods: Previous Obesity Pillars Roundtables addressed the diagnostic limitations of BMI, the importance of android and visceral fat (especially among those with South and East Asian ancestry), and considerations of obesity among individuals who identify as Hispanic, diverse in sexual-orientation, Black, Native American, and having ancestry from the Mediterranean and Middle East regions. This roundtable examines considerations of BMI in Black and female individuals. Results: The panelists agreed that body composition assessment was a more accurate measure of adiposity and muscle mass than BMI. When it came to matters of race and sex, one panelist felt: "race is a social construct and not a defining biology." Another felt that: "BMI should be a screening tool to prompt further evaluation of adiposity that utilizes better diagnostic tools for body composition." Regarding bias and misperceptions of resistance training in female individuals, another panelist stated: "I have spent my entire medical career taking care of women and have never seen a woman unintentionally gain 'too much' muscle mass and bulk up from moderate strength training." Conclusions: Conveying the importance of race and sex regarding body composition has proven challenging, with the discussion sometimes devolving into misunderstandings or misinformation that may be perceived as racist or sexist. Body composition analysis is the ultimate diagnostic equalizer in addressing the inaccuracies and biases inherent in the exclusive use of BMI.

Indexed as

Body compositionFemaleObesityRacistSexist

Identifiers

PMID37990673
PMCPMC10662008
OpenAlexW4309380170

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.