Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37992183›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of infectious diseases2024

The Novavax Heterologous Coronavirus Disease 2019 Booster Demonstrates Lower Reactogenicity Than Messenger RNA: A Targeted Review.

Anthony M Marchese, Matthew Rousculp, John Macbeth, Hadi Beyhaghi, Bruce T Seet, Seth Toback

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04889209 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Phase 1/2 Study of Delayed Heterologous SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Dosing (Boost) After Receipt of EUA Vaccines

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)Ran2021 to 2023Enrolled867ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsAd26.COV2.S, BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, mRNA-1273.211, mRNA-1273.222
NCT07287137 phase4active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

IDCRP-154: Comparative Immunogenicity of Respiratory Virus Vaccines (CIRV2) Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorHenry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military MedicineRan2025 to 2027Enrolled54ConditionsCOVID -19, COVID - 19, COVID 19, InfluenzaArmsPfizer-BioNTech mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, Novavax recombinant protein vaccine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Intranasal Delivery ofVaccines · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anthony M MarcheseDepartment of Medical Affairs, Novavax, Inc, Gaithersburg, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-8468-9666
Matthew RousculpDepartment of Medical Affairs, Novavax, Inc, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
John MacbethDepartment of Medical Affairs, Novavax, Inc, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Hadi BeyhaghiDepartment of Medical Affairs, Novavax, Inc, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Bruce T SeetDepartment of Medical Affairs, Novavax, Inc, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Seth TobackDepartment of Medical Affairs, Novavax, Inc, Gaithersburg, Maryland.

Funding

Ashfield MedCommsInizio companyNovavax, Inc
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to be a global health concern, and booster doses are necessary for maintaining vaccine-mediated protection, limiting the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Despite multiple COVID-19 vaccine options, global booster uptake remains low. Reactogenicity, the occurrence of adverse local/systemic side effects, plays a crucial role in vaccine uptake and acceptance, particularly for booster doses. We conducted a targeted review of the reactogenicity of authorized/approved messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein-based vaccines demonstrated by clinical trials and real-world evidence. It was found that mRNA-based boosters show a higher incidence and an increased severity of reactogenicity compared with the Novavax protein-based COVID-19 vaccine (NVX-CoV2373). In a recent study from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the incidence of pain/tenderness, swelling, erythema, fatigue/malaise, headache, muscle pain, or fever was higher in individuals boosted with BNT162b2 (0.4% to 41.6% absolute increase) or mRNA-1273 (5.5% to 55.0% absolute increase) compared with NVX-CoV2373. Evidence suggests that NVX-CoV2373, when utilized as a heterologous booster, demonstrates less reactogenicity compared with mRNA vaccines, which, if communicated to hesitant individuals, may strengthen booster uptake rates worldwide. Clinical Trials Registration NCT04889209.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesImmunization, Secondary2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273BNT162 VaccineClinical Trials as TopicHumansmRNA Vaccines2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273BNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesmRNA VaccinesNVX-CoV2373 adjuvated lipid nanoparticleboosterCOVID-19mRNA vaccinesNVX-CoV2373reactogenicity

Identifiers

PMID37992183
PMCPMC11326839

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.