ArticleIn silico pharmacology2023
Virtual screening of pyrazole derivatives of usnic acid as new class of anti-hyperglycemic agents against PPARγ agonists.
Article in In silico pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The finest sources of therapeutic agents are natural products, and usnic acid is a secondary metabolite derived from lichen that has a wide range of biological actions, including anti-viral, anti-cancer, anti-bacterial, and anti-diabetic (hyperglycemia). Based on the hyperglycemia activity of UA, this work seeks to identify new anti-hyperglycemia medicines by virtual screening of pyrazole derivatives of UA. Seven hit compounds (Compounds 1, 5, 6, 7, 17, 18 and 33), which finally go through docking-based screening to produce the lead molecule, were identified by the physicochemical attributes, drug-likeliness, and ADMET prediction. The docking score for the chosen compounds containing PPARγ agonists ranged from -7.6 to -9.2 kcal/mol, whereas the docking goal for compounds 5, 6, and 7 was -9.2 kcal/mol. Based on the binding energy and bound amino acid residues as well as compared to the reference compound, compound-6 considered as lead compound. Furthermore, the MD simulation of 3CS8-Compound-6 and 3CS8-Rosiglitazone complexes were performed to verify the stability of these complexes and the binding posture acquired in docking experiments. The compound-6 had strong pharmacological characteristics, bound to the PPARγ agonist active site, and was expected to reduce the activity of the receptor, according to the virtual screening results. It must be justified to conduct both Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40203-023-00176-y.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.