ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2023
Increasing diversity of functional genetics studies to advance biological discovery and human health.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reporting and representation of population descriptors in public RNA-seq databases.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- Fifteen-year trends in cancer incidence and mortality among older adults aged 65 years and older in Martinique, a Caribbean population-based registry study, 2008-2022.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Mapping the gene regulatory landscape of archaic hominin introgression in modern Papuans.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Cross-ancestry information transfer framework improves protein abundance prediction and protein-trait association identification.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Gene expression profiling of dendritic cell tolerance dysfunction in women with systemic lupus erythematosus.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Genomic profiling of active vitamin D colonic responses in African- and European-Americans identifies an ancestry-related regulatory variant of POLB.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Long-read transcriptomics of a diverse human cohort reveals ancestry bias in gene annotation.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Defining breast epithelial cell types in the single-cell era.Developmental cell · 2025Review
- A map of blood regulatory variation in South Africans enables GWAS interpretation.Nature genetics · 2025Article
- The expanding global genomics landscape: Converging priorities from national genomics programs.American journal of human genetics · 2025Review
- Common and rare genetic variation intersects with ancestry to influence human skin and plasma carotenoid concentrations.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Building national patient registries in Mexico: insights from the MexOMICS Consortium.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
- A quarter-century of synthetic data in healthcare: Unveiling trends with structural topic modeling.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this perspective we discuss the current lack of genetic and environmental diversity in functional genomics datasets. There is a well-described Eurocentric bias in genetic and functional genomic research that has a clear impact on the benefit this research can bring to underrepresented populations. Current research focused on genetic variant-to-function experiments aims to identify molecular QTLs, but the lack of data from genetically diverse individuals has limited analyses to mostly populations of European ancestry. Although some efforts have been established to increase diversity in functional genomic studies, much remains to be done to consistently generate data for underrepresented populations from now on. We discuss the major barriers for this continuity and suggest actionable insights, aiming to empower research and researchers from underserved populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.