Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37996522›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Complete chloroplast genomes of six neotropical palm species, structural comparison, and evolutionary dynamic patterns.

Ana Flávia Francisconi, Jonathan Andre Morales Marroquín, Luiz Augusto Cauz-Santos, Cássio van den Berg, Kauanne Karolline Moreno Martins, Marcones Ferreira Costa, Doriane Picanço-Rodrigues, Luciano Delmodes de Alencar, Cesar Augusto Zanello, Carlos Augusto Colombo and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Flávia Francisconi *Programa de Pós-Gradução em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, R. Monteiro Lobato, 255-Barão Geraldo, Campinas, São Paulo, CEP 13083-862, Brazil.
Jonathan Andre Morales Marroquín *Programa de Pós-Gradução em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, R. Monteiro Lobato, 255-Barão Geraldo, Campinas, São Paulo, CEP 13083-862, Brazil.
Luiz Augusto Cauz-SantosDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030, Wien, Austria.
Cássio van den BergDepartamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Av. Transnordestina S/N-Novo Horizonte, Feira de SantanaFeira de Santana, Bahia, CEP 44036-900, Brazil.
Kauanne Karolline Moreno MartinsPrograma de Pós-Gradução em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, R. Monteiro Lobato, 255-Barão Geraldo, Campinas, São Paulo, CEP 13083-862, Brazil.
Marcones Ferreira CostaPrograma de Pós-Gradução em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, R. Monteiro Lobato, 255-Barão Geraldo, Campinas, São Paulo, CEP 13083-862, Brazil.
Doriane Picanço-RodriguesDepartamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Avenida Gen. Rodrigo Octávio Jordão Ramos, 3000-Coroado I-Campus Universitário-Senador Arthur Virgílio Filho-Setor Sul, Bloco H, Manaus, Amazonas, CEP 69077-000, Brazil.
Luciano Delmodes de AlencarPrograma de Pós-Gradução em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, R. Monteiro Lobato, 255-Barão Geraldo, Campinas, São Paulo, CEP 13083-862, Brazil.
Cesar Augusto ZanelloPrograma de Pós-Gradução em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, R. Monteiro Lobato, 255-Barão Geraldo, Campinas, São Paulo, CEP 13083-862, Brazil.
Carlos Augusto ColomboInstituto Agronômico, Av. Theodureto de Almeida Camargo, 1500, Campinas, São Paulo, CEP 13075-630, Brazil.
Brenda Gabriela Díaz HernándezInstituto Agronômico, Av. Theodureto de Almeida Camargo, 1500, Campinas, São Paulo, CEP 13075-630, Brazil.
Danilo Trabuco AmaralDepartamento de Biologia, Centro de Ciências Humanas e Biológicas, Universidade Federal do ABC, Avenida dos Estados, 5001, Santo André, São Paulo, CEP 09040-040, Brazil.
Maria Teresa Gomes LopesFaculdade de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Avenida Rodrigo Otávio Ramos, 3000-Bairro Coroado, Manaus, Amazonas, CEP 69077-000, Brazil.
Elizabeth Ann VeaseyDepartamento de Genética, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Pádua Dias, 11-Bairro São Dimas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, CEP 13418-900, Brazil.
Maria Imaculada ZucchiAgência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios (APTA), Polo Centro Sul, Rodovia SP 127 Km 30, CP 28, Piracicaba, São Paulo, CEP 13400-970, Brazil. mizucchi@apta.sp.gov.br.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade Federal do Amazonas · BRAgência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual de Feira de Santana · BRUniversidade Federal do ABC · BRUniversidade Federal do Piauí · BRUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 21/10319-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Arecaceae family has a worldwide distribution, especially in tropical and subtropical regions. We sequenced the chloroplast genomes of Acrocomia intumescens and A. totai, widely used in the food and energy industries; Bactris gasipaes, important for palm heart; Copernicia alba and C. prunifera, worldwide known for wax utilization; and Syagrus romanzoffiana, of great ornamental potential. Copernicia spp. showed the largest chloroplast genomes (C. prunifera: 157,323 bp and C. alba: 157,192 bp), while S. romanzoffiana and B. gasipaes var. gasipaes presented the smallest (155,078 bp and 155,604 bp). Structurally, great synteny was detected among palms. Conservation was also observed in the distribution of single sequence repeats (SSR). Copernicia spp. presented less dispersed repeats, without occurrence in the small single copy (SSC). All RNA editing sites were C (cytidine) to U (uridine) conversions. Overall, closely phylogenetically related species shared more sites. Almost all nodes of the phylogenetic analysis showed a posterior probability (PP) of 1.0, reaffirming the close relationship between Acrocomia species. These results elucidate the conservation among palm chloroplast genomes, but point to subtle structural changes, providing support for the evolutionary dynamics of the Arecaceae family.

Indexed as

ArecaceaeGenome, ChloroplastPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID37996522
PMCPMC10667357
OpenAlexW4388934228

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.