Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38014715›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2024

Molecular signatures of alternative reproductive strategies in a facultatively social hover wasp.

Benjamin A Taylor, Daisy Taylor, Alexandrina Bodrug-Schepers, Francisco Câmara Ferreira, Nancy Stralis-Pavese, Heinz Himmelbauer, Roderic Guigó, Max Reuter, Seirian Sumner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Benjamin A TaylorCentre for Biodiversity & Environment Research, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8634-0484
Daisy TaylorSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Alexandrina Bodrug-SchepersDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Francisco Câmara FerreiraCentre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.
Nancy Stralis-PaveseDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Heinz HimmelbauerDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Roderic GuigóCentre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.
Max ReuterDepartment of Genetics, Evolution & Environment, University College London, London, UK.
Seirian SumnerCentre for Biodiversity & Environment Research, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0213-2018

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R003882/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S003681/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social insect reproductives and non-reproductives represent ideal models with which to understand the expression and regulation of alternative phenotypes. Most research in this area has focused on the developmental regulation of reproductive phenotypes in obligately social taxa such as honey bees, while relatively few studies have addressed the molecular correlates of reproductive differentiation in species in which the division of reproductive labour is established only in plastic dominance hierarchies. To address this knowledge gap, we generate the first genome for any stenogastrine wasp and analyse brain transcriptomic data for non-reproductives and reproductives of the facultatively social species Liostenogaster flavolineata, a representative of one of the simplest forms of social living. By experimentally manipulating the reproductive 'queues' exhibited by social colonies of this species, we show that reproductive division of labour in this species is associated with transcriptomic signatures that are more subtle and variable than those observed in social taxa in which colony living has become obligate; that variation in gene expression among non-reproductives reflects their investment into foraging effort more than their social rank; and that genes associated with reproductive division of labour overlap to some extent with those underlying division of labour in the separate polistine origin of wasp sociality but only explain a small portion of overall variation in this trait. These results indicate that broad patterns of within-colony transcriptomic differentiation in this species are similar to those in Polistinae but offer little support for the existence of a strongly conserved 'toolkit' for sociality.

Indexed as

WaspsAnimalsBeesGene Expression ProfilingReproductionSocial BehaviorSocial DominanceTranscriptomebehavior/social evolutioneusocialitysocial insectssociogenomicstranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID38014715
PMCPMC10953455

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.