Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38015454›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2024

COVID-19 vaccination and relapse activity: A nationwide cohort study of patients with multiple sclerosis in Denmark.

Dominika Stastna, Frederik Elberling, Luigi Pontieri, Elisabeth Framke, Dana Horakova, Jiri Drahota, Petra Nytrova, Melinda Magyari

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. SARS-CoV-2 Is Linked to Brain Volume Loss in Multiple Sclerosis.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dominika StastnaDepartment of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia.ORCID 0000-0003-2418-4847
Frederik ElberlingDanish Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.
Luigi PontieriDanish Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1506-3827
Elisabeth FramkeDanish Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.
Dana HorakovaDepartment of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia.ORCID 0000-0003-1915-0036
Jiri DrahotaDepartment of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia.ORCID 0000-0003-3416-2094
Petra NytrovaDepartment of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czechia.ORCID 0000-0003-4885-602X
Melinda MagyariDanish Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0972-5222
Charles University · CZCopenhagen University Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Agentura Pro Zdravotnický Výzkum České RepublikyEuropean Union - Next Generation EUMinisterstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské RepublikyUniverzita Karlova v Praze
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeWe evaluated whether there was a difference in the occurrence of relapses pre- and post-COVID-19 vaccination in a nationwide cohort of Danish patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis.

methodsWe conducted a population-based, nationwide cohort study with a cutoff date of 1 October 2022. We used McNemar tests to assess changes in the proportion of patients with recorded relapses within 90 days and 180 days before and after first vaccine dose, and a negative binomial regression model to compare the 90 and 180 days postvaccination annualized relapse rate (ARR) to the 360 days prevaccination ARR. Multivariate Cox regression was used to estimate relapse risk factors.

resultsWe identified 8169 vaccinated (87.3% Comirnaty) patients without a recorded history of a positive COVID-19 test. We did not find statistically significant changes in the proportion of patients with relapses in the 90 days (1.3% vs. 1.4% of patients, p = 0.627) and 180 days (2.7% vs. 2.6% of patients, p = 0.918) pre- and postvaccination. Also, a comparison of the ARR 360 days before (0.064, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.058-0.070) with the ARR 90 (0.057, 95% CI = 0.047-0.069, p = 0.285) and 180 (0.055, 95% CI = 0.048-0.063, p = 0.060) days after vaccination did not show statistically significant differences. Lower age, higher Expanded Disability Status Scale score, and relapse within 360 days before vaccination were associated with a higher risk of relapse.

conclusionsWe did not find evidence of increased relapse activity following the administration of the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine.

Indexed as

COVID-19Multiple SclerosisMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingChronic DiseaseCohort StudiesCOVID-19 VaccinesDenmarkHumansRecurrenceVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19multiple sclerosisrelapsesafetyvaccine

Identifiers

PMID38015454
PMCPMC11235886
OpenAlexW4389078114

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.