Evidence mapPaperPMID 38015795Full record

ArticleDiabetes2024

Critical Evaluation of Indices Used to Assess β-Cell Function.

Chao Cao, Han-Chow E Koh, Dominic N Reeds, Bruce W Patterson, Samuel Klein, Bettina Mittendorfer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chao CaoCenter for Human Nutrition, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Han-Chow E KohCenter for Human Nutrition, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Dominic N ReedsCenter for Human Nutrition, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Bruce W PattersonCenter for Human Nutrition, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Samuel KleinCenter for Human Nutrition, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Bettina MittendorferCenter for Human Nutrition, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0003-0049-2677

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR002345 · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · 2025 to 2025
$9.3M
Washington University Nutrition Obesity Research CenterP30DK056341 · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · 1999 to 2025
$5.7M
WU P&FP30DK020579 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · 2022 to 2025
$5.6M
The Washington University Center for Diabetes Translation ResearchP30DK092950 · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · 2025 to 2025
$850k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020579NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056341NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092950NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK115400NIH HHS R01 DK115400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assessment of β-cell function, defined as the relationship between insulin secretion rate (ISR) and plasma glucose, is not standardized and often involves any of a number of β-cell function indices. We compared β-cell function by using popular indices obtained during basal conditions and after glucose ingestion, including the HOMA-B index, the basal ISR (or plasma insulin)-to-plasma glucose concentration ratio, the insulinogenic and ISRogenic indices, the ISR (or plasma insulin)-to-plasma glucose concentration areas (or incremental areas) under the curve ratio, and the disposition index, which integrates a specific β-cell function index value with an estimate of insulin sensitivity, between lean people with normal fasting glucose (NFG) and normal glucose tolerance (NGT) (n = 50) and four groups of people with obesity (n = 188) with 1) NFG-NGT, 2) NFG and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), 3) impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and IGT, and 4) type 2 diabetes. We also plotted the ISR-plasma glucose relationship before and after glucose ingestion and used a statistical mixed-effects model to evaluate group differences in this relationship (i.e., β-cell function). Index-based group differences in β-cell function produced contradicting results and did not reflect the group differences of the actual observed ISR-glucose relationship or, in the case of the disposition index, group differences in glycemic status. The discrepancy in results is likely due to incorrect mathematical assumptions that are involved in computing indices, which can be overcome by evaluating the relationship between ISR and plasma glucose with an appropriate statistical model. Data obtained with common β-cell function indices should be interpreted cautiously. ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS:

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glucose IntoleranceInsulin ResistanceBlood GlucoseFastingGlucoseHumansInsulinBlood GlucoseGlucoseInsulin

Identifiers

PMID38015795
PMCPMC10882145

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.