ArticleDiabetes2024
Critical Evaluation of Indices Used to Assess β-Cell Function.
Article in Diabetes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety of HD-6277, a Novel G Protein-Coupled Receptor 40 Agonist, in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Phase 2 Clinical Trial.Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2026Trial
- Sleep-Aligned Extended Overnight Fasting Improves Nighttime and Daytime Cardiometabolic Function.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2026Trial
- Changes in IL-1β and Pancreatic Islet Function and Their Correlation Before and After Weight Loss in Obese Individuals.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026Article
- Effect of complete, lifelong ANGPTL3 deficiency on triglyceride-rich lipoprotein kinetics.Cell reports. Medicine · 2025Article
- Low-calorie diets and remission of type 2 diabetes in Chinese: phenotypic changes and individual variability.Nutrition journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The assessment of β-cell function, defined as the relationship between insulin secretion rate (ISR) and plasma glucose, is not standardized and often involves any of a number of β-cell function indices. We compared β-cell function by using popular indices obtained during basal conditions and after glucose ingestion, including the HOMA-B index, the basal ISR (or plasma insulin)-to-plasma glucose concentration ratio, the insulinogenic and ISRogenic indices, the ISR (or plasma insulin)-to-plasma glucose concentration areas (or incremental areas) under the curve ratio, and the disposition index, which integrates a specific β-cell function index value with an estimate of insulin sensitivity, between lean people with normal fasting glucose (NFG) and normal glucose tolerance (NGT) (n = 50) and four groups of people with obesity (n = 188) with 1) NFG-NGT, 2) NFG and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), 3) impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and IGT, and 4) type 2 diabetes. We also plotted the ISR-plasma glucose relationship before and after glucose ingestion and used a statistical mixed-effects model to evaluate group differences in this relationship (i.e., β-cell function). Index-based group differences in β-cell function produced contradicting results and did not reflect the group differences of the actual observed ISR-glucose relationship or, in the case of the disposition index, group differences in glycemic status. The discrepancy in results is likely due to incorrect mathematical assumptions that are involved in computing indices, which can be overcome by evaluating the relationship between ISR and plasma glucose with an appropriate statistical model. Data obtained with common β-cell function indices should be interpreted cautiously. ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.