Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38018103›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2023

Community assembly of the human piercing microbiome.

Charles C Y Xu, Juliette Lemoine, Avery Albert, Élise Mac Whirter, Rowan D H Barrett

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
21.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Community assembly of the human piercing microbiome.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Charles C Y XuRedpath Museum, McGill University, 859 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 0C4.ORCID 0000-0001-6779-8879
Juliette LemoineRedpath Museum, McGill University, 859 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 0C4.ORCID 0009-0004-2506-8404
Avery AlbertRedpath Museum, McGill University, 859 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 0C4.ORCID 0000-0003-3745-819X
Élise Mac WhirterTattoo Lounge MTL, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H2X 2V4.
Rowan D H BarrettRedpath Museum, McGill University, 859 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 0C4.ORCID 0000-0003-3044-2531
McGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting how biological communities respond to disturbance requires understanding the forces that govern their assembly. We propose using human skin piercings as a model system for studying community assembly after rapid environmental change. Local skin sterilization provides a 'clean slate' within the novel ecological niche created by the piercing. Stochastic assembly processes can dominate skin microbiomes due to the influence of environmental exposure on local dispersal, but deterministic processes might play a greater role within occluded skin piercings if piercing habitats impose strong selection pressures on colonizing species. Here we explore the human ear-piercing microbiome and demonstrate that community assembly is predominantly stochastic but becomes significantly more deterministic with time, producing increasingly diverse and ecologically complex communities. We also observed changes in two dominant and medically relevant antagonists (

Indexed as

EcosystemMicrobiotaBacteriaBiotaHumansStochastic Processes16Sbacteriabiodiversityecological nicheenvironmental changeskin microbiome

Identifiers

PMID38018103
PMCPMC10685111
OpenAlexW4389146516

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.