Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38020134›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2023

Social prescribing outcomes: a mapping review of the evidence from 13 countries to identify key common outcomes.

Jill Sonke, Nico Manhas, Cassandra Belden, Jane Morgan-Daniel, Seher Akram, Stefany Marjani, Oluwasanmi Oduntan, Gabrielle Hammond, Gabriella Martinez, Gray Davidson Carroll and 5 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Outcomes and instruments used in social prescribing: a modified umbrella review.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Social prescribing: Reclaiming the heart of community-rooted family medicine.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jill SonkeCenter for Arts in Medicine, College of the Arts, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Nico ManhasCenter for Arts in Medicine, College of the Arts, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Cassandra BeldenCenter for Arts in Medicine, College of the Arts, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Jane Morgan-DanielHealth Science Center Libraries, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Seher AkramCenter for Arts in Medicine, College of the Arts, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Stefany MarjaniCenter for Arts in Medicine, College of the Arts, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Oluwasanmi OduntanCenter for Arts in Medicine, College of the Arts, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Gabrielle HammondCenter for Arts in Medicine, College of the Arts, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Gabriella MartinezCenter for Arts in Medicine, College of the Arts, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Gray Davidson CarrollCenter for Arts in Medicine, College of the Arts, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Alexandra K RodriguezCenter for Arts in Medicine, College of the Arts, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Shanaé BurchCenter for Arts in Medicine, College of the Arts, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Aaron J ColversonCenter for Arts in Medicine, College of the Arts, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Virginia PesataCenter for Arts in Medicine, College of the Arts, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Daisy FancourtDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: As a means for supporting a range of health and wellbeing goals, social prescribing programs have been implemented around the world. Reflecting a range of contexts, needs, innovation, and programing, a broad array of outcomes has been studied in relation to these programs. As interest in social prescribing grows, more targeted study of key outcomes and in turn evidence synthesis that can inform evidence-based practice, policy, and investment is needed. Methods and Results: This mapping review identified, described, and synthesized the broad array of social prescribing outcomes that have been studied in 13 countries and maps the outcomes that have been most commonly studied. From 87 articles included in this review, a total of 347 unique outcomes were identified, including 278 unique patient outcomes and 69 unique system outcomes. The most commonly studied categories of patient outcomes were found to be mental health, lifestyle and behavior, and patient/service user experience. The most commonly studied system outcomes were healthcare/service utilization and financial/economic outcomes. Discussion: This review highlights the value of heterogeneity and mixed methods approaches in outcomes studies for capturing nuanced experiences and outcomes in this nascent area of practice, while contributing to the advancement of evidence synthesis for social prescribing globally by quantifying and offering insight into the outcomes that have been studied to date. It also lays a foundation for the development of key common outcomes and a Core Outcomes Set for social prescribing. Additionally, it identified key outcomes that, given their relationship to critical health and social issues, warrant both broader and deeper study.

Indexed as

arts prescribingmapping reviewoutcomessocial prescribingsocial prescribing outcomes

Identifiers

PMID38020134
PMCPMC10660286

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.