Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38020937›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2023

Comparison of Low-Energy Radiofrequency Thermal Vaginal Therapy with Sham Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Orawee Chinthakanan, Apisith Saraluck, Athasit Kijmanawat, Komkrit Aimjirakul, Rujira Wattanayingcharoenchai, Jittima Manonai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Orawee ChinthakananDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Apisith SaraluckDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-0528-7031
Athasit KijmanawatDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Komkrit AimjirakulDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rujira WattanayingcharoenchaiDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jittima ManonaiDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-5302-4370
Mahidol University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and Hypothesis: Low-energy radiofrequency (RF) thermal vaginal therapy for vaginal laxity and the genitourinary syndrome of menopause denatures collagen fibrils in the endopelvic fascia; fiber tightening during healing may stabilize the urethra and bladder neck, thereby resolving female stress urinary incontinence (SUI), especially in postmenopausal women. This study compared RF vaginal therapy with sham treatment for mild to moderate SUI. Methods: This double-blinded, randomized controlled trial, conducted at a tertiary center from September 2018 to April 2021, recruited postmenopausal women with mild to moderate degree of SUI who had never undergone surgery, energy-based therapy, or vaginal estrogen treatment. The intervention group received vaginal RF laser treatment; the sham group did not. The primary outcome was the 1-hour pad-weight test (PWT) result. Secondary outcomes were Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QOL), Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6), Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7), Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), percentage of improvement among all participants, and adverse events. Data were analyzed using STATA 17.0. Results: Forty-nine participants randomized to RF (n = 23) and sham (n = 26) groups were eligible for analysis. PWT decreased during follow-up in the RF group but remained stable in the sham group; PWT did not significantly differ between groups. The 1-year post-treatment success rate was higher in the RF group (69.6%) than in the sham group (38.5%). At 1 year post-treatment, there were no statistically significant differences in any secondary outcomes. Conclusion: Low-energy RF vaginal therapy is an alternative treatment for mild to moderate SUI in postmenopausal women without serious adverse events. Larger randomized controlled trials should be conducted.

Indexed as

laserpostmenopausal womenradiofrequencyrandomized controlled trialstress urinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID38020937
PMCPMC10657547
OpenAlexW4388705902

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.