Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38029757›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2023

Chaos in a bacterial stress response.

Divya Choudhary, Kevin R Foster, Stephan Uphoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Divya ChoudharyDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Kevin R FosterDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK; Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK. Electronic address: kevin.foster@biology.ox.ac.uk.
Stephan UphoffDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK. Electronic address: stephan.uphoff@bioch.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

European Research CouncilWellcome Trust 209397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular responses to environmental changes are often highly heterogeneous and exhibit seemingly random dynamics. The astonishing insight of chaos theory is that such unpredictable patterns can, in principle, arise without the need for any random processes, i.e., purely deterministically without noise. However, while chaos is well understood in mathematics and physics, its role in cell biology remains unclear because the complexity and noisiness of biological systems make testing difficult. Here, we show that chaos explains the heterogeneous response of Escherichia coli cells to oxidative stress. We developed a theoretical model of the gene expression dynamics and demonstrate that chaotic behavior arises from rapid molecular feedbacks that are coupled with cell growth dynamics and cell-cell interactions. Based on theoretical predictions, we then designed single-cell experiments to show we can shift gene expression from periodic oscillations to chaos on demand. Our work suggests that chaotic gene regulation can be employed by cell populations to generate strong and variable responses to changing environments.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalNonlinear Dynamicsbacterial stress responsechaosgene regulationoxidative stressphenotypic heterogeneitysingle-cell analysis

Identifiers

PMID38029757
PMCPMC7616676

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.