Evidence mapPaperPMID 38032644Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2023

Cardiometabolic Effects of Omnivorous vs Vegan Diets in Identical Twins: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Matthew J Landry, Catherine P Ward, Kristen M Cunanan, Lindsay R Durand, Dalia Perelman, Jennifer L Robinson, Tayler Hennings, Linda Koh, Christopher Dant, Amanda Zeitlin and 4 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05297825 (Twins Nutrition Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
22.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05297825 nacompletednot on this map

Twins Nutrition Study (TwiNS): Vegan vs. Omnivore

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled44ConditionsLipid Metabolism, Glucose Intolerance, Weight Change, Body, MicrobiomeArmsVegan diet, Omnivore diet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Diet for Human and Planetary Health: Why We Should Consider Limiting Meat?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew J LandryStanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Catherine P WardStanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Kristen M CunananQuantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Lindsay R DurandStanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Dalia PerelmanStanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Jennifer L RobinsonStanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Tayler HenningsStanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Linda KohStanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Christopher DantStanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Amanda ZeitlinStanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Emily R EbelDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Erica D SonnenburgDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Justin L SonnenburgDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Christopher D GardnerStanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Stanford University · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Cardiovascular and Chronic Disease Prevention Training ProgramT32HL161270 · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · 2025 to 2025
$574k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001085NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003142NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL161270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Increasing evidence suggests that, compared with an omnivorous diet, a vegan diet confers potential cardiovascular benefits from improved diet quality (ie, higher consumption of vegetables, legumes, fruits, whole grains, nuts, and seeds). Objective: To compare the effects of a healthy vegan vs healthy omnivorous diet on cardiometabolic measures during an 8-week intervention. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center, population-based randomized clinical trial of 22 pairs of twins (N = 44) randomized participants to a vegan or omnivorous diet (1 twin per diet). Participant enrollment began March 28, 2022, and continued through May 5, 2022. The date of final follow-up data collection was July 20, 2022. This 8-week, open-label, parallel, dietary randomized clinical trial compared the health impact of a vegan diet vs an omnivorous diet in identical twins. Primary analysis included all available data. Intervention: Twin pairs were randomized to follow a healthy vegan diet or a healthy omnivorous diet for 8 weeks. Diet-specific meals were provided via a meal delivery service from baseline through week 4, and from weeks 5 to 8 participants prepared their own diet-appropriate meals and snacks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was difference in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration from baseline to end point (week 8). Secondary outcome measures were changes in cardiometabolic factors (plasma lipids, glucose, and insulin levels and serum trimethylamine N-oxide level), plasma vitamin B12 level, and body weight. Exploratory measures were adherence to study diets, ease or difficulty in following the diets, participant energy levels, and sense of well-being. Results: A total of 22 pairs (N = 44) of twins (34 [77.3%] female; mean [SD] age, 39.6 [12.7] years; mean [SD] body mass index, 25.9 [4.7]) were enrolled in the study. After 8 weeks, compared with twins randomized to an omnivorous diet, the twins randomized to the vegan diet experienced significant mean (SD) decreases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration (-13.9 [5.8] mg/dL; 95% CI, -25.3 to -2.4 mg/dL), fasting insulin level (-2.9 [1.3] μIU/mL; 95% CI, -5.3 to -0.4 μIU/mL), and body weight (-1.9 [0.7] kg; 95% CI, -3.3 to -0.6 kg). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of the cardiometabolic effects of omnivorous vs vegan diets in identical twins, the healthy vegan diet led to improved cardiometabolic outcomes compared with a healthy omnivorous diet. Clinicians can consider this dietary approach as a healthy alternative for their patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05297825.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDiet, VeganAdultBody WeightCholesterol, LDLDiet, HealthyFemaleHumansInsulinsMaleMiddle AgedTwins, MonozygoticVegetablesCholesterol, LDLInsulins

Identifiers

PMID38032644
PMCPMC10690456
OpenAlexW4389180633

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.