Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38038261›Full record

ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Ablative 5-Fraction Stereotactic MRI-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Samantha Webking, Maria L Sandoval, Michael D Chuong, Antonio Ucar, Santiago Aparo, Fernando De Zarraga, Ibrahim Sahin, Tiago Biachi, Dae W Kim, Sarah E Hoffe and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Samantha WebkingAmerican University of the Caribbean, Dutch Sint Maarten, Cupecoy.ORCID 0009-0007-9255-0884
Maria L SandovalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Michael D ChuongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA.
Antonio UcarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA.
Santiago AparoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA.
Fernando De ZarragaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA.
Ibrahim SahinDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Tiago BiachiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Dae W KimDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Sarah E HoffeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Jessica M FrakesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Russell F PalmDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0448-8715
Moffitt Cancer Center · USAmerican University of the Caribbean School of Medicine · SXUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMetastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) carries a poor prognosis and significant morbidity from local tumor progression. We investigated outcomes among oligometastatic PDAC patients treated with stereotactic magnetic resonance image-guided ablative radiotherapy (SMART) to primary disease.

methodsWe performed a retrospective multi-institutional analysis of oligometastatic PDAC at diagnosis or with metachronous oligoprogression during induction chemotherapy treated with primary tumor SMART. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), freedom from locoregional failure (FFLRF), and freedom from distant failure (FFDF). Acute and late toxicity were reported and in exploratory analyses patients were stratified by the number of metastases, SMART indication, and addition of metastasis-directed therapy.

resultsFrom 2019 to 2021, 22 patients with oligometastatic PDAC (range: 1-6 metastases) received SMART to the primary tumor with a median follow-up of 11.2 months from SMART. Nineteen patients had de novo synchronous metastatic disease and three had metachronous oligoprogression. Metastasis location most commonly was liver only (40.9%), multiple organs (27.3%), lungs only (13.6%), or abdominal/pelvic nodes (13.6%). All patients received either FOLFIRINOX (64%) or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (36%) followed by SMART (median 50 Gy, 5 fractions) for local control (77%), pain control (14%), or local progression (9%). Additionally, 41% of patients received other metastasis-directed treatments. The median OS from diagnosis and SMART was 23.9 months and 11.6 months, respectively. Calculated from SMART, the median PFS was 2.4 months with 91% of patients having distant progression, and 1-year local control was 68. Two patients (9%) experienced grade 3 toxicities, gastric outlet obstruction, and gastrointestinal bleed without grade 4 or 5 toxicity.

conclusionThere was minimal morbidity of local disease progression after SMART in this cohort of oligometastatic PDAC. As systemic therapy options improve, additional strategies to identify patients who may derive benefits from local consolidation or metastasis-directed therapy are needed.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaPancreatic NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansPrognosisRetrospective Studieslocal controlMRI-guided radiotherapyoligometastatic pancreatic adenocarcinomastereotactic magnetic resonance image-guided ablative radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID38038261
PMCPMC10693219
OpenAlexW4389224543

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.