Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38040992›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2024

Critical Care Management of Patients After Cardiac Arrest: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association and Neurocritical Care Society.

Karen G Hirsch, Benjamin S Abella, Edilberto Amorim, Mary Kay Bader, Jeffrey F Barletta, Katherine Berg, Clifton W Callaway, Hans Friberg, Emily J Gilmore, David M Greer and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. New Insights into Cardiac Intensive Care.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Pathophysiology and Prognostic Significance of Myoclonus in Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy.Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society · 2026
    Review
  9. Navigating diagnostic overlap between seizures and movement disorders: A practical clinical approach.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Editorial: Advances in neurocritical care.Frontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Comparison of the Efficacy of Epinephrine vs Norepinephrine in Clinical Outcomes among Children with Postcardiac Arrest Shock: A Hospital-based, Double Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Karen G HirschStanford -University, Stanford, USA.
Benjamin S AbellaUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Edilberto AmorimSan Francisco-Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Mary Kay BaderProvidence Mission Hospital Nursing Center of Excellence/Critical Care Services, Mission Viejo, USA.
Jeffrey F BarlettaMidwestern -University, Downers Grove, USA.
Katherine BergBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA.
Clifton W CallawayUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Hans FribergSkane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Emily J GilmoreYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA.
David M GreerBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, USA.
Karl B KernSarver Heart Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.
Sarah LivesayRush University College of Nursing, Chicago, USA.
Teresa L MayMaine Medical Center, Portland, USA.
Robert W NeumarUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Jerry P NolanWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Mauro OddoCHUV-Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mary Ann PeberdyVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.
Samuel M PoloyacUniversity of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA.
David SederMaine Medical Center, Portland, USA.
Fabio Silvio TacconeHopital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Anezi UzenduSt. Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, USA.
Brian WalshUniversity of Texas Medical Branch School of Health Sciences, Galveston, USA.
Janice L ZimmermanThe Methodist Hospital Physician Organization, Houston, USA.
Romergryko G GeocadinJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA. rgeocad1@jhmi.edu.
American Heart Association, Neurocritical Care Society

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The critical care management of patients after cardiac arrest is burdened by a lack of high-quality clinical studies and the resultant lack of high-certainty evidence. This results in limited practice guideline recommendations, which may lead to uncertainty and variability in management. Critical care management is crucial in patients after cardiac arrest and affects outcome. Although guidelines address some relevant topics (including temperature control and neurological prognostication of comatose survivors, 2 topics for which there are more robust clinical studies), many important subject areas have limited or nonexistent clinical studies, leading to the absence of guidelines or low-certainty evidence. The American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and the Neurocritical Care Society collaborated to address this gap by organizing an expert consensus panel and conference. Twenty-four experienced practitioners (including physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and a respiratory therapist) from multiple medical specialties, levels, institutions, and countries made up the panel. Topics were identified and prioritized by the panel and arranged by organ system to facilitate discussion, debate, and consensus building. Statements related to postarrest management were generated, and 80% agreement was required to approve a statement. Voting was anonymous and web based. Topics addressed include neurological, cardiac, pulmonary, hematological, infectious, gastrointestinal, endocrine, and general critical care management. Areas of uncertainty, areas for which no consensus was reached, and future research directions are also included. Until high-quality studies that inform practice guidelines in these areas are available, the expert panel consensus statements that are provided can advise clinicians on the critical care management of patients after cardiac arrest.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationEmergency Medical ServicesHeart ArrestAmerican Heart AssociationCritical CareHumansUnited StatesAHA scientific statementsCritical careHeart arrestHypoxia–ischemia, brainResuscitationShock, cardiogenic

Identifiers

PMID38040992
PMCPMC10861627

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.